On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Quim Gil wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 03:05 PM, ext Sergio Ahumada Navea wrote:
>> https://wiki.qt-project.org/Public_Autotest_Infrastructure
>
> Thanks!
Yes, thanks - this certainly makes things much clearer on the auto
test side of things.
>
> https://wiki.qt-project.o
https://wiki.qt-project.org/Who_does_what looks better now, and the
pages linked contain a good amount of names. Thank you!
There is still a lot of homework to do connecting mapping all the roles
and linking them to user profiles though.
On 12/02/2011 08:48 AM, ext Richard Moore wrote:
> On Th
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Marijn Kruisselbrink
wrote:
> On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:53:23 PM quim@nokia.com wrote:
>> Approvers: is there a way to know who is an approver? It would be also
>> useful to have a rough idea of what approvers are interested in a specific
>> component.
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:53:23 PM quim@nokia.com wrote:
> Approvers: is there a way to know who is an approver? It would be also
> useful to have a rough idea of what approvers are interested in a specific
> component. And link to profile again.
http://codereview.qt-project.org/#admin,
>
> What about the infrastructure? Marius Storm-Olsen seems to have the only
> official role. It would be useful to map all the areas and roles under that
> critical piece of the Qt project, with the same level of detail than the
> software maintainers.
https://wiki.qt-project.org/Public_Autote
Since we are a meritocratic organization it is important to know who does what.
Currently it is difficult (if not impossible?) to know the whole picture.
Please help mapping everybody with an official Qt Project role at
https://wiki.qt-project.org/Who_does_what and linked pages.
Maintainers: I
