On Sunday 06 September 2015 14:25:39 Daniel Levin wrote:
> In Git fixup commits should be rebased onto lowest revision, ideally the
> one that introduced bug. So it can be merged into nested branches later. If
> issue was added into 5.3 then that is your rebase point.
That is, as long as that bran
In Git fixup commits should be rebased onto lowest revision, ideally the
one that introduced bug. So it can be merged into nested branches later. If
issue was added into 5.3 then that is your rebase point.
On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 8:27 AM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
wrote:
> On Sunday 06 September 2015
On Sunday 06 September 2015, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have resolved a DoS vulnerability in the Qt WebSockets module (see
> https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-48123). Which branch should I commit
> this patch to: 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6 or dev? This issue is present from the
> very first versio
Hi,
I have resolved a DoS vulnerability in the Qt WebSockets module (see
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-48123).
Which branch should I commit this patch to: 5.3, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6 or dev?
This issue is present from the very first version (since Qt 5.3).
Cheers,
Kurt
__
