On Monday, 6 February 2023 15:15:36 PST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > Actually, maxNumBuckets is wrong, allowing bucketsForCapacity to overflow.
> > But in practice this will only affect you after the QHash has grown to
> > more than half the virtual memory size (which can only ha
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 19:28, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Monday, 6 February 2023 11:37:07 PST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Monday, 6 February 2023 11:21:13 PST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
[snip]
> > No. It's a false positive. The value that GCC is reporting is also
> > impossible:
> >
>
On Monday, 6 February 2023 11:37:07 PST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 6 February 2023 11:21:13 PST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
>
> wrote:
> > When building qtbase 6.4.2 on Debian I see:
> >
> > In member function ‘__ct ’,
> >
> > inlined from ‘detached’ at
> >
> > ./obj-x86_64
On Monday, 6 February 2023 11:21:13 PST Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> When building qtbase 6.4.2 on Debian I see:
>
> In member function ‘__ct ’,
> inlined from ‘detached’ at
> ./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/include/QtCore/../../../src/corelib/tools/qhash.h:57
> 5:20, inlined from ‘det
When building qtbase 6.4.2 on Debian I see:
In member function ‘__ct ’,
inlined from ‘detached’ at
./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/include/QtCore/../../../src/corelib/tools/qhash.h:575:20,
inlined from ‘detach’ at
./obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/include/QtCore/../../../src/corelib/tools/qhash.h:1501:75:
.
