Re: [Development] Updates on Qt Location

2022-08-07 Thread Tuukka Turunen
at 15.36 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Updates on Qt Location Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > In the dependency declaration in the current dev branch [1], qtwebengine > lists qtpositioning, and not qtlocation. > > [1] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebeng

Re: [Development] Updates on Qt Location

2022-07-23 Thread Kevin Kofler via Development
Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > In the dependency declaration in the current dev branch [1], qtwebengine > lists qtpositioning, and not qtlocation. > > [1] https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtwebengine.git/tree/dependencies.yaml > > So I assume that this covers the geolocation functionality that was needed >

Re: [Development] Updates on Qt Location

2022-07-23 Thread Volker Hilsheimer
> On 23 Jul 2022, at 13:38, Kevin Kofler via Development > wrote: > > Volker Hilsheimer wrote: >> From what we see (in download numbers and when talking to customers >> waiting for Qt Location), making Qt Location work with Qt 6.2 brings the >> most value to most users, Open Source or otherwise.

Re: [Development] Updates on Qt Location

2022-07-23 Thread Kevin Kofler via Development
Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > From what we see (in download numbers and when talking to customers > waiting for Qt Location), making Qt Location work with Qt 6.2 brings the > most value to most users, Open Source or otherwise. Your download counts do not include Open Source users because those get Qt

Re: [Development] Updates on Qt Location

2022-07-23 Thread Volker Hilsheimer
> On 22 Jul 2022, at 23:19, Kevin Kofler via Development > wrote: > > Volker Hilsheimer wrote: >> - we make Qt Location available as versions that works with Qt 6 LTS >> releases (ie we’ll have something that works with Qt 6.2, but won’t spend >> time on making something that is tested against 6

Re: [Development] Updates on Qt Location

2022-07-22 Thread Kevin Kofler via Development
Volker Hilsheimer wrote: > - we make Qt Location available as versions that works with Qt 6 LTS > releases (ie we’ll have something that works with Qt 6.2, but won’t spend > time on making something that is tested against 6.3 or 6.4). IMHO, as long as Qt LTS keeps abusing that loophole in the KDE

Re: [Development] Updates on Qt Location

2022-07-21 Thread Volker Hilsheimer
> On 21 Jul 2022, at 14:23, Alexandru Croitor wrote: > > Hi, > >> - we make Qt Location available as versions that works with Qt 6 LTS >> releases (ie we’ll have something that works with Qt 6.2, but won’t spend >> time on making something that is tested against 6.3 or 6.4). > > Will there

Re: [Development] Updates on Qt Location

2022-07-21 Thread Alexandru Croitor
Hi, > - we make Qt Location available as versions that works with Qt 6 LTS releases > (ie we’ll have something that works with Qt 6.2, but won’t spend time on > making something that is tested against 6.3 or 6.4). Will there be qtlocation git tags and separate branches for each 6.2 patch relea

[Development] Updates on Qt Location

2022-07-21 Thread Volker Hilsheimer
Hi, Lauri Laanmets, Alex, Shawn and myself had a talk about the state of Qt Location and next steps yesterday. Qt Location is not officially available for Qt 6 yet, and here’s what we are going to do about it: Lauri and others have done a fantastic job of porting most of Qt Location to Qt 6 a