Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-10-15 Thread Lincoln Ramsay
On 16/10/12 03:35, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Will do. I need help from Ossi to figure out how I broke qmake, because it's > not evident. Most likely it's qconfig.cpp, which contains the paths returned by QLibrary. There's a special version of this file just for qmake (generated by configure). --

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-10-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 15 de outubro de 2012 15.42.34, Knoll Lars wrote: > >> PS: I tried modifying QLibraryInfo to add the new path but I somehow > >> broke > >> qmake for some unknown reason... > > > > > > > > By the way, adding the QML2 path is what's holding the QtQuick1 > > un-messifying back. I

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-10-15 Thread Knoll Lars
On Oct 15, 2012, at 5:04 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 15 de outubro de 2012 07.54.42, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On segunda-feira, 15 de outubro de 2012 07.55.56, Knoll Lars wrote: Note that I called it "qml2" because it's based on the QML 2 engine. That means it

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-10-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 15 de outubro de 2012 07.54.42, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 15 de outubro de 2012 07.55.56, Knoll Lars wrote: > > > Note that I called it "qml2" because it's based on the QML 2 engine. > > > That > > > means it would apply to Cascades code using QML 2, not just Qt Q

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-10-15 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 15 de outubro de 2012 07.55.56, Knoll Lars wrote: > > Note that I called it "qml2" because it's based on the QML 2 engine. That > > means it would apply to Cascades code using QML 2, not just Qt Quick 2. > > Should we have the '2' in the name? We've avoided it other places as we

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-10-15 Thread Knoll Lars
On Oct 10, 2012, at 10:03 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 10 de outubro de 2012 18.23.49, Knoll Lars wrote: >> I am against making QML2 a subdirectory of imports (ie. option a1). So >> either a separate directory, or we keep the QML 1 modules in a >> subdirectory. Both are ok for m

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-10-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 10 de outubro de 2012 18.23.49, Knoll Lars wrote: > I am against making QML2 a subdirectory of imports (ie. option a1). So > either a separate directory, or we keep the QML 1 modules in a > subdirectory. Both are ok for me. cf the layout proposal: lib/qt5/imports-> Qt Q

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-10-10 Thread Knoll Lars
On Oct 10, 2012, at 7:53 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 24 de setembro de 2012 15.07.06, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> import $prefix/imports $prefix/imports >> $prefix/imports >> QtQuick 1.[01] QtQuick 1.[01] QtQuick 2.0 > > H

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-10-10 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 24 de setembro de 2012 15.07.06, Thiago Macieira wrote: > import $prefix/imports $prefix/imports > $prefix/imports > QtQuick 1.[01] QtQuick 1.[01] QtQuick 2.0 Hmm... Qt Quick 1 in Qt 5 supports installing its files in a sub

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-09-24 Thread Thomas McGuire
Hi, On Monday 24 September 2012 15:50:54 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 24 de setembro de 2012 15.38.46, Thomas McGuire wrote: > > Well, in Qt5, QtQuick has been split up into libQtQml and libQtQuick, so > > it can't just be renamed back to libQtDeclarative. > > Why not? Oh, my mista

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-09-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 24 de setembro de 2012 15.38.46, Thomas McGuire wrote: > Well, in Qt5, QtQuick has been split up into libQtQml and libQtQuick, so it > can't just be renamed back to libQtDeclarative. Why not? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open S

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-09-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 24 de setembro de 2012 13.27.44, Knoll Lars wrote: > I tend to agree here. So a +1 from my side, even though it'll mean some pain > in the short term for us. Implemented in https://codereview.qt-project.org/35516 https://codereview.qt-project.org/35517 Giving it

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-09-24 Thread Thomas McGuire
Hi, On Monday 24 September 2012 15:07:06 Thiago Macieira wrote: > [Related to the co-installation and hierarchy discussions] > > Through a series of well-intentioned decisions, we ended up having: > > Qt Quick 1 (Qt4)Qt Quick 1 (Qt 5) Qt > Quick 2 > QT +=

Re: [Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-09-24 Thread Knoll Lars
On Sep 24, 2012, at 3:07 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > [Related to the co-installation and hierarchy discussions] > > Through a series of well-intentioned decisions, we ended up having: > > Qt Quick 1 (Qt4)Qt Quick 1 (Qt 5) Qt > Quick 2 > QT += decl

[Development] Un-messifying Qt Quick

2012-09-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
[Related to the co-installation and hierarchy discussions] Through a series of well-intentioned decisions, we ended up having: Qt Quick 1 (Qt4)Qt Quick 1 (Qt 5) Qt Quick 2 QT += declarative quick1 quick