On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:44:36PM +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 11.16.31, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:32:31AM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> > > It would be nice if we can make things simpler for all distros by
> > > re
On terça-feira, 22 de maio de 2012 11.16.31, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:32:31AM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> > It would be nice if we can make things simpler for all distros by
> > renaming our tools.
> >
> > What do we gain from keeping the same name for all
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 08:32:31AM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> It would be nice if we can make things simpler for all distros by
> renaming our tools.
> What do we gain from keeping the same name for all our tools across
> major versions?
>
we don't complicate our own release process
On 05/22/2012 01:27 AM, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> I think the most important part is that we actually have a reasonable, auto-
>> detected default. If the application is run under Wayland, it loads the
>> Wayland plugin.
>
> Currently, our default on each platform is hardcoded.
> Windows -
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:13:09PM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> 2. Rename our qt5 tool binaries - the binary names of moc, uic, qmake
>> conflict in qt3 and qt4. Now with qt5, we will have another conflict.
>> Is it possible
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On sábado, 12 de maio de 2012 12.13.09, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
>> 5. QPA plugins + packaging: One can install the wayland and xcb plugin
>> simultaneously. We need a mechanism to switch the QPA plugin globally
>> for all apps. One can u
- Original Message -
> On Saturday 12 May 2012 22:01:09 Sergio Ahumada Navea wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > 1. Qt SDK vs Ubuntu repo install - Currently, Qt SDK is a
> > > separate
> > > download from Nokia website. Ubuntu packages creator and Qt. This
> > > could cause confusion as to which to
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:53 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com wrote:
> avoid regressions or incompatibility problems caused by a newer
> version of QtSDK. If we think about Qt and QtCreator just as an SDK to
> write applications I agree with you that developers should have the
> latest tools available, but
Hi,
On 12 May 2012 21:13, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Here's some comments that I collected from UDS last week. Quim,
> Donald, Thiago and Adam might have more to add.
>
> I have cc'ed Jonathan who was giving us a lot of the feedback, he
> should be able to point us to the right peopl
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:13:09PM -0700, ext Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> 2. Rename our qt5 tool binaries - the binary names of moc, uic, qmake
> conflict in qt3 and qt4. Now with qt5, we will have another conflict.
> Is it possible to rename all our tool binaries to be moc5, qmake5?
>
i don't wan
On 5/12/12 9:13 PM, "ext Girish Ramakrishnan"
wrote:
>1. Qt SDK vs Ubuntu repo install - Currently, Qt SDK is a separate
>download from Nokia website. Ubuntu packages creator and Qt. This
>could cause confusion as to which to choose. I think the decision made
>here was that this is not entirely s
On Saturday 12 May 2012 22:01:09 Sergio Ahumada Navea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > 1. Qt SDK vs Ubuntu repo install - Currently, Qt SDK is a separate
> > download from Nokia website. Ubuntu packages creator and Qt. This
> > could cause confusion as to which to choose. I think the decision made
> > here was
On sábado, 12 de maio de 2012 12.13.09, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote:
> 5. QPA plugins + packaging: One can install the wayland and xcb plugin
> simultaneously. We need a mechanism to switch the QPA plugin globally
> for all apps. One can use environment variables right now, but maybe
> we should also
On sábado, 12 de maio de 2012 22.01.09, Sergio Ahumada Navea wrote:
> > 1. Qt SDK vs Ubuntu repo install - Currently, Qt SDK is a separate
> > download from Nokia website. Ubuntu packages creator and Qt. This
> > could cause confusion as to which to choose. I think the decision made
> > here was th
Hi,
> 1. Qt SDK vs Ubuntu repo install - Currently, Qt SDK is a separate
> download from Nokia website. Ubuntu packages creator and Qt. This
> could cause confusion as to which to choose. I think the decision made
> here was that this is not entirely solvable since Qt SDK contains much
> more than
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Girish Ramakrishnan
wrote:
> 1. Qt SDK vs Ubuntu repo install - Currently, Qt SDK is a separate
> here was that this is not entirely solvable since Qt SDK contains much
> more than creator and Qt (it has the sysroots and toolchains required
> for the devices). Is
Hi Guys,
Here's some comments that I collected from UDS last week. Quim,
Donald, Thiago and Adam might have more to add.
I have cc'ed Jonathan who was giving us a lot of the feedback, he
should be able to point us to the right people for further
collaboration.
1. Qt SDK vs Ubuntu repo install - C
17 matches
Mail list logo
