Guido, Giuseppe, I got your points.
It's so sad to read "we don't have the resources" cause I believe Qt has an
enormous potential and I enjoy every day using it (except when I can't get
things to work lol)
As for me taking care of such matterswellyou don't really want that :)
(and I hav
> So my wonder is this: if the SVG rendering of QtWebKit/QtWebEngine is modern
> and solid, why not "extracting" it
> from those monsters and place it into a brand new QtSvg ?
Very easy to ask for something like that. When do you start?
> This would bring two advantages:1- applications that n
On 12 March 2015 at 16:47, Massimo Callegari wrote:
>
> 3- it removes duplicated code between QtSvg and QtWebEngine
But there's no such code. QtWebEngine is a "thin" wrapper around
Blink/Chromium. The idea is precisely that Qt currently does not have
the resources for maintaining its port/fork of
On 12/03/2015 16:47, Massimo Callegari wrote:
Apologies if my mail doesn't have proper carriage returns in pipermail
! (my crappy webmail's fault)
Just want to add a third advantage in decoupling QtWebEngine from SVG:
3- it removes duplicated code between QtSvg and QtWebEngine
Just a note. F
Apologies if my mail doesn't have proper carriage returns in pipermail ! (my
crappy webmail's fault)
Just want to add a third advantage in decoupling QtWebEngine from SVG:
3- it removes duplicated code between QtSvg and QtWebEngine
Cheers,
Massimo___
Dev
Hi everyone,following my last November's email about QtMultimedia
(http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2014-November/019035.html)
(where in 4 months almost all the efforts kept on going to camera
support...leaving almost 200 tickets rotting on JIRA) it seems that my lack of
luck c
