Jason H wrote:
> I also have to point out that there was a statement made by Lars to make
> QML [more] strongly typed. I had expected that from the beginning, that
> Python would be the scripting language of QML, not Javascript[0],
I don't see how Python is inherently more strongly typed than Java
On Monday, 19 August 2019 12:34:23 PDT Jason H wrote:
> > > Can Qt set a "no private destructor!" rule?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Private destructors have a purpose.
>
> Would a workable re-wording be "always provide a public means of
> destruction"?
No, since the purpose is to prevent you from doing
Dear all,
I am using PyQt since 10 years now and my points are:
- It is true that missing bindings is a serious issue to use PySide
actually.
- I noticed PyQt has simpler wrapper code, but I don't investigated more.
- I would dream to have Python instead of JS, but we know how to
implement a
> > Can Qt set a "no private destructor!" rule?
>
> No.
>
> Private destructors have a purpose.
Would a workable re-wording be "always provide a public means of destruction"?
To be clear, I am not sure what the actual issue is, why it's private, or why
shiboken can't handle it. In the immediate
On Monday, 19 August 2019 08:55:45 PDT Jason H wrote:
> Can Qt set a "no private destructor!" rule?
No.
Private destructors have a purpose.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel System Software Products
__
hmark. That's got me in C++. But I'm
also eagerly awaiting for the time I can interop with my python coworkers!
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 at 10:36 AM
> From: "Cristián Maureira-Fredes"
> To: "development@qt-project.org"
> Subject: Re: [Development] Techn
e the module.
Thanks for your comments,
Cheers
> (snip)
>
>
>
>> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 at 8:39 AM
>> From: "Cristián Maureira-Fredes"
>> To: "development@qt-project.org"
>> Subject: [Development] Technical vision for Qt fo
d me.
1. Since Qt lagged many years in getting an ECMA Script 7 implementation,
chasing this evolving standard might not be the best.
2. Why maintain V4?
> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 at 8:39 AM
> From: "Cristián Maureira-Fredes"
> To: "development@qt-project.org&q
Hello,
After the general discussion of the vision for Qt6,
we wanted to say a few things regarding Qt for Python.
Even though we are talking about a Python module,
the whole development is C and C++ related, and due to
Python's popularity, we have been getting a lot of attention
on Shiboken, the
