On 4/04/2013 8:38 PM, Koehne Kai wrote:
> I'd like to update the recommended 32 bit MinGW toolchain (that we also ship
> in binary installers) for 5.1 from
>
>x32-4.7.2-release-posix-sjlj-rev8
> to
>x32-4.8.0-release-posix-dwarf-rev1
>
> The recommended 64 bit toolchain would change accord
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:24 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
>
> For Qt code, that is not relevant. We don't let exceptions travel through
> Win32 kernel code and we do not interface with other C++ libraries that
> throw
> exceptions. We only call C code and we expect that code to behave under the
> rul
On quinta-feira, 4 de abril de 2013 23.05.24, Soroush R wrote:
> My PC is compiling Qt fo x86 with a dwarf4-enabled MinGW distro right now.
> I'll upload it when completed. I can't see any reason to avoid using DWARF
> on windows, except crashes on exceptions from outside; which I have no idea
> wh
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
> In light of the recent mentioning of gcc's switch to DWARF4 from
> DWARF2 with version 4.8, which should help get down the size of debug
> builds, I am very much for giving the 4.8.0 option a try.
>
> Cheers,
> Axel
> __
In light of the recent mentioning of gcc's switch to DWARF4 from
DWARF2 with version 4.8, which should help get down the size of debug
builds, I am very much for giving the 4.8.0 option a try.
Cheers,
Axel
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-pr
Hi there,
I'd like to update the recommended 32 bit MinGW toolchain (that we also ship in
binary installers) for 5.1 from
x32-4.7.2-release-posix-sjlj-rev8
to
x32-4.8.0-release-posix-dwarf-rev1
The recommended 64 bit toolchain would change accordingly from
x64-4.7.2-release-posix-sjlj-
