Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-06-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 2 de junho de 2016 11:59:20 BRT Marc Mutz wrote: > On Saturday 20 February 2016 19:04:18 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > It would buy us, if we raised to GCC 4.8 too: > > - deleted and defaulted members > > > > (nsdmi, delegating constructors, template aliases require GCC 4.7) > > A

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-06-02 Thread Marc Mutz
On Saturday 20 February 2016 19:04:18 Thiago Macieira wrote: > It would buy us, if we raised to GCC 4.8 too: > - deleted and defaulted members > (nsdmi, delegating constructors, template aliases require GCC 4.7) According to qcompilerdetection.h, deleted and defaulted members are available from

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-30 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Wednesday 25 May 2016, Jake Petroules wrote: > Hi all, > > Might be a bit premature, but is anyone opposed to dropping OS X 10.9 and > iOS 7.x in Qt 5.8? This would follow dropping one OS X and iOS release per > Qt release for the past 3 releases, but after that I think we should slow > to drop

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-30 Thread Shawn Rutledge
> > > > From: Development > [mailto:development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Jake Petroules > Sent: keskiviikkona 25. toukokuuta 2016 21.17 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8 > >

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-30 Thread Mark Gaiser
> > > > Tuukka > > > > *From:* Development [mailto:development-bounces+tuukka.turunen= > qt...@qt-project.org] *On Behalf Of *Jake Petroules > *Sent:* keskiviikkona 25. toukokuuta 2016 21.17 > *To:* development@qt-project.org > *Subject:* [Development] Supporte

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-30 Thread Tim Blechmann
> Might be a bit premature, but is anyone opposed to dropping OS X 10.9 > and iOS 7.x in Qt 5.8? yes: it will prevent some users (including me) to update to qt-5.8, as our minimum osx requirement is still 10.9. ___ Development mailing list Development@q

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-26 Thread Tuukka Turunen
: Development [mailto:development-bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Jake Petroules Sent: keskiviikkona 25. toukokuuta 2016 21.17 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8 Hi all, Might be a bit premature, but is anyone opposed to dropping

[Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-05-25 Thread Jake Petroules
Hi all, Might be a bit premature, but is anyone opposed to dropping OS X 10.9 and iOS 7.x in Qt 5.8? This would follow dropping one OS X and iOS release per Qt release for the past 3 releases, but after that I think we should slow to dropping one release for each release we add (so, once annual

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-03-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 3 de março de 2016 00:36:34 PST rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: > On 3/3/2016 12:26 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quinta-feira, 3 de março de 2016 00:23:45 PST rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: > >> 5.6 releases tomorrow > > > > No, it doesn't. > > http://wiki.qt.io/Qt-5.6-release It's

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-03-02 Thread rpzrpz...@gmail.com
On 3/3/2016 12:26 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 3 de março de 2016 00:23:45 PST rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: 5.6 releases tomorrow No, it doesn't. http://wiki.qt.io/Qt-5.6-release ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.o

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-03-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 3 de março de 2016 00:23:45 PST rpzrpz...@gmail.com wrote: > 5.6 releases tomorrow No, it doesn't. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Development mailing

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-03-02 Thread rpzrpz...@gmail.com
With all the talk about support on 5.7 and 5.8, is 5.6 going to support debugging under IOS 9.2 Simulator? 5.6 releases tomorrow, Qt Creator Bug 15705 not fixed. Has anybody debugged Qt 5.6 under IOS 9.x Simulator recently? md On 3/3/2016 12:17 AM, Turunen Tuukka wrote: André Somers kir

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-03-02 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> André Somers kirjoitti 2.3.2016 kello 22.28: > > > > Op 20/02/2016 om 08:38 schreef Petroules Jake: >> "Continue" with iOS 7? It's currently iOS 6 in both 5.7 and dev branches. >> However, I wholeheartedly approve bumping it to 7. >> >> This puts us at a minimum of "last four releases" (b

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-03-02 Thread André Somers
Op 20/02/2016 om 08:38 schreef Petroules Jake: "Continue" with iOS 7? It's currently iOS 6 in both 5.7 and dev branches. However, I wholeheartedly approve bumping it to 7. This puts us at a minimum of "last four releases" (by the time 5.8 is released) for both OS X and iOS. However I'd argue

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-03-02 Thread Petroules Jake
On Feb 19, 2016, at 11:38 PM, Petroules Jake mailto:jake.petrou...@theqtcompany.com>> wrote: * We require the latest Xcode toolchain and OS X on the Mac for compiling (see separate mailing list thread). We support deployment to OS X 10.9 and later (dropping 10.8) +1 * On iOS, we also require

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-26 Thread James McDonnell
unique_ptr is probably useable. The library is only a problem when you need something that involves constexpr. constexpr support has been disabled in the library because some constexpr code uses C floating point functions that weren¹t changed to allow their use in constexpr C++ functions. Disabl

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-26 Thread Marc Mutz
On Friday 26 February 2016 20:15:37 Blasche Alexander wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From Marc Mutz > > > > On Friday 19 February 2016 22:01:02 Knoll Lars wrote: > > > * We continue to support QNX 6.6 > > > > Does someone here know (Rafael) when we can expect a QNX that supports > > C+

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-26 Thread Blasche Alexander
> -Original Message- > From Marc Mutz > On Friday 19 February 2016 22:01:02 Knoll Lars wrote: > > * We continue to support QNX 6.6 > > Does someone here know (Rafael) when we can expect a QNX that supports > C++11 > at the library level? During Embedded World, a person at the QNX booth t

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-26 Thread Marc Mutz
On Friday 19 February 2016 22:01:02 Knoll Lars wrote: > * We continue to support QNX 6.6 Does someone here know (Rafael) when we can expect a QNX that supports C++11 at the library level? People want to use std::unique_ptr and currently we need to stop them from doing so, in platform-independent

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-24 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: torstaina 25. helmikuuta 2016 0.18 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Supported

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-24 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 24 de fevereiro de 2016 21:53:06 PST Blasche Alexander wrote: > > Basically it means we are stuck with Visual Studio 2012 c++ featureset > > for Windows Embedded Compact 2013. > > I spoke to the Microsoft guys on Embedded World today. (too bad I couldn't go) > They confirmed th

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-24 Thread Blasche Alexander
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+alexander.blasche=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Andreas Holzammer ... > Am 22.02.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Thiago Macieira: > > On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 21:08:12 PST Knoll Lars wrote: > >

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-23 Thread Turunen Tuukka
[Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8 > > On Tuesday, 23 February 2016 13:09:10 WET Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On terça-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:39 PST Sergio Martins wrote: > > > On Monday, 22 February 2016 22:01:31 WET Thiago Macieira wrote: > > &

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-23 Thread Sergio Martins
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016 13:09:10 WET Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:39 PST Sergio Martins wrote: > > On Monday, 22 February 2016 22:01:31 WET Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > On terça-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 05:32:55 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > > >

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-23 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:39 PST Sergio Martins wrote: > On Monday, 22 February 2016 22:01:31 WET Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On terça-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 05:32:55 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > > > Is Qt 5.7 going to be the *only* release to support WEC2013? > > > > >

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-23 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 19:16:48 PST Andreas Holzammer wrote: > As of problems to support it in newer Qt Versions, I can say the market > share right now is not very big, as also already indicated by someone > else. Hardware vendors do release right now more experimental support > f

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-23 Thread Sergio Martins
On Monday, 22 February 2016 22:01:31 WET Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 05:32:55 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > > Is Qt 5.7 going to be the *only* release to support WEC2013? > > > > No. Both Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.7 will support WEC13. > > Quoting you on your yesterday'

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-23 Thread Gunnar Roth
Hi, I also like to add that Win10 IoT is NOT THE successor for wec2013. MS will offer some porting tools, but as you can see here http://embeddingwindowssuccess.blogspot.de/2015/03/the-future-of-windows-embedded-windows.html

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-23 Thread Andreas Holzammer
Am 22.02.2016 um 23:52 schrieb Thiago Macieira: > On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 21:08:12 PST Knoll Lars wrote: >> I can see the reasoning here, just as well as I see the reasoning of the >> people that would like to get rid of VS2012 as quickly as possible. > > Why do we need to get ri

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2016 05:32:55 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > Is Qt 5.7 going to be the *only* release to support WEC2013? > > No. Both Qt 5.6 and Qt 5.7 will support WEC13. Quoting you on your yesterday's email: "With Qt 5.6.0 the WEC13 is still experimental" So 5.6 doesn't co

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: maanantaina 22. helmikuuta 2016 19.32 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Suppo

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 21:08:12 PST Knoll Lars wrote: > I can see the reasoning here, just as well as I see the reasoning of the > people that would like to get rid of VS2012 as quickly as possible. Why do we need to get rid of it? What are the problems with it, aside from lack

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Knoll Lars
On 22/02/16 19:32, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 18:16:47 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> For both WEC7 and WEC13 Qt 5.6 should be a very good release to use, while >> for WEC13 also Qt 5.7 is an option. However as Qt 5.6 is

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 18:16:47 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: > Hi, > > For both WEC7 and WEC13 Qt 5.6 should be a very good release to use, while > for WEC13 also Qt 5.7 is an option. However as Qt 5.6 is a LTS release > supporting both WEC7 and WEC13, it is a very good baseline. W

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Turunen Tuukka
: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8 This is a deja vu to me, somehow. please have a look at this discussion https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=development@qt-project.org&q=subject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5BDevelopment%5C%5D+QtCS%5C%3A+Long+Term+Rel

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Gunnar Roth
webkit/engine support  and no multimedia support, no neon intrinsics support, no openssl support, no sse2 support.   Regards, Gunnar Roth   Gesendet: Montag, 22. Februar 2016 um 17:01 Uhr Von: "Andrew Knight" An: development@qt-project.org Betreff: Re: [Development] Supported platfo

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Andrew Knight
On 02/22/2016 05:54 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 14:59:52 PST Roger Briggen wrote: WEC2013 is also supported by Visual Studio 2013 and Visual Studio 2015 (according to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg154234.aspx) because it uses now the ARM Desk

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 14:59:52 PST Roger Briggen wrote: > WEC2013 is also supported by Visual Studio 2013 and Visual Studio 2015 > (according to https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg154234.aspx) > because it uses now the ARM Desktop Compiler. > So dropping VS2012 must not

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Roger Briggen
Knoll Lars theqtcompany.com> writes: > > Hi, > > Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of supported compilers and platforms > for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with different people, here's an initial proposal from my side: > > * We drop support for VS2012. Thi

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+tuukka.turunen=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: sunnuntaina 21. helmikuuta 2016 23.51 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Suppo

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Bogdan Vatra
Hi, On Friday 19 February 2016 21:01:02 Knoll Lars wrote: > Hi, > > Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of > supported compilers and platforms for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with > different people, here's an initial proposal from my side: > [...] > > * Mini

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2016 07:59:55 PST Ziller Eike wrote: > > It would buy us, if we raised to GCC 4.8 too: > > - deleted and defaulted members > > Hm, deleted and defaulted members should work fine with gcc 4.7(.3) as well. Right, I think I cut/pasted the wrong entry. We'd need G

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-22 Thread Ziller Eike
> On Feb 20, 2016, at 7:04 PM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > On sexta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:02 PST Knoll Lars wrote: >> * We drop support for VS2012. This implicitly drops support for WEC2013. >> Reason is that the compiler is still having rather large problems with it's >> C++11

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:02 PST Knoll Lars wrote: > Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of > supported compilers and platforms for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with > different people, here's an initial proposal from my side: Let me just say

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-21 Thread Marc Mutz
My 0.02$: On Saturday 20 February 2016 19:04:18 Thiago Macieira wrote: > - delegating constructors This can help reduce code size (both source and executable) for types with many constructors. E.g. QTreeWidgetitem, or QStringView. > - "explicit operator" member funcvtions Safe bool operators,

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2016 21:01:02 PST Knoll Lars wrote: > * We drop support for VS2012. This implicitly drops support for WEC2013. > Reason is that the compiler is still having rather large problems with it's > C++11 support. I hope that we could serve the WEC market rather well with

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-19 Thread Petroules Jake
On Feb 19, 2016, at 10:58 PM, Andreas Holzammer mailto:andreas.holzam...@kdab.com>> wrote: Hi, What about support for Windows IoT, which might be the successor of WEC. Are there plans to support this? Isn't this implicitly covered under Universal Windows Platform (Windows 10 + WinRT APIs)? T

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-19 Thread Kalinowski Maurice
> > > Andreas Holzammer kirjoitti 20.2.2016 > kello 8.58: > > > > Hi, > > > > What about support for Windows IoT, which might be the successor of > WEC. > > Are there plans to support this? > > > > We already have support for Windows 10 / WinRT, so it is a rather > straightforward task to do whe

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-19 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> Joseph Crowell kirjoitti 20.2.2016 kello 9.09: > > What about VS 2013? > Based on our understanding it offers quite decent C++11 support and should stay supported. Yours, Tuukka >> On 20/02/2016 7:01 AM, Knoll Lars wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-19 Thread Turunen Tuukka
> Andreas Holzammer kirjoitti 20.2.2016 kello 8.58: > > Hi, > > What about support for Windows IoT, which might be the successor of WEC. > Are there plans to support this? > We already have support for Windows 10 / WinRT, so it is a rather straightforward task to do when there is need. Maur

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-19 Thread Joseph Crowell
What about VS 2013? On 20/02/2016 7:01 AM, Knoll Lars wrote: Hi, Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of supported compilers and platforms for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with different people, here's an initial proposal from my side: * We drop support for

Re: [Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-19 Thread Andreas Holzammer
Hi, What about support for Windows IoT, which might be the successor of WEC. Are there plans to support this? Thank you Andy Am 19.02.2016 um 22:01 schrieb Knoll Lars: > Hi, > > Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of > supported compilers and platforms for Qt

[Development] Supported platforms for Qt 5.8

2016-02-19 Thread Knoll Lars
Hi, Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of supported compilers and platforms for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with different people, here's an initial proposal from my side: * We drop support for VS2012. This implicitly drops support for WEC2013. Reason is t