On tirsdag 10. januar 2017 11.37.56 CET Simon Hausmann wrote:
> (2) I really wish the placement of the configuration files for the
> platforms being moved to qt5.git had a high priority, because it prevents
> situations like these where the R&D organization, the project, contributors
> and part
gt;>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> From: Tony Sarajärvi
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 12:31:10 PM
>> To: Simon Hausmann; development@qt-project.org
>> Subject: RE: [Development] State of dev branch in CI
>>
>> Hi,
>>
&
smann; development@qt-project.org
Subject: RE: [Development] State of dev branch in CI
Hi,
Sounds good to me. I’ll proceed with that.
Funny that the only platform we’ve managed to get in during the last half a
year or year is immediately causing problems so that we have to remove it
;)
-Tony
should
> work again.
>
>
>
> Simon
>
>
> From: Tony Sarajärvi
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 12:31:10 PM
> To: Simon Hausmann; development@qt-project.org
> Subject: RE: [Development] State of dev branch in CI
>
> Hi,
>
>
smann; development@qt-project.org
Subject: RE: [Development] State of dev branch in CI
Hi,
Sounds good to me. I’ll proceed with that.
Funny that the only platform we’ve managed to get in during the last half a
year or year is immediately causing problems so that we have to remove it ;)
-Tony
2:31:10 PM
To: Simon Hausmann; development@qt-project.org
Subject: RE: [Development] State of dev branch in CI
Hi,
Sounds good to me. I’ll proceed with that.
Funny that the only platform we’ve managed to get in during the last half a
year or year is immediately causing problems so that we hav
ct.org] On Behalf Of
Simon Hausmann
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 12:43 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] State of dev branch in CI
Hi,
I just had another chat with Liang about this situation. We can't get a newer
qtbase into qt5.git because tests in declarativ
t and help from the CI team to do that.
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Simon Hausmann
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 10:49:29 AM
To: Sean Harmer; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] State of dev branch in CI
Hi,
as far as I can tell
: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] State of dev branch in CI
Hi Simon,
is this resolved yet?
Cheers,
Sean
On Saturday 07 January 2017 10:18:22 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Brief "update": dev is still blocked.
>
>
> The build issue of https:
I.
>
>
> (2) Temporary reversal of the macOS 10.9 drop (that would allow (1) to
> proceed) or CI changes as mentioned in (b).
>
>
>
>
> Simon
>
> ____________
> From: Development
> on behalf of Simon Hausmann Sent: Thursday, January
> 5, 2017 8:50:52 PM
the macOS 10.9 drop (that would allow (1) to
proceed) or CI changes as mentioned in (b).
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Simon Hausmann
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 8:50:52 PM
To: development
Subject: [Development] State of dev branch in CI
Hi,
I want
Hi,
I wanted to give a quick update on the state of the dev branch in the CI:
Currently any changes to any module outside of qtbase targeting the dev branch
will fail to pass the build stage in the CI.
Recently RHEL 7.2 was added to dev. When that was tested - back in fall last
year - all was
12 matches
Mail list logo
