] State of 5.9 and dev branches
Thank you Thiago, Sergio and Lars!
qtbase 5.6 and 5.9 are good again.
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 10:54:22 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development
Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 12:11:13 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] State of 5.9 and dev branches
Thanks for cleaning this up quickly!
When it comes to testing, do we want to go one step further and
make the tests be completely independent of the current time? We would
ote:
>
>
> Thank you Thiago, Sergio and Lars!
>
> qtbase 5.6 and 5.9 are good again.
>
> Simon
> From: Development
> on behalf of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 10:54:22 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] State of
Thank you Thiago, Sergio and Lars!
qtbase 5.6 and 5.9 are good again.
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Thiago Macieira
Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 10:54:22 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] State of 5.9 and dev branches
On
On Monday, 7 August 2017 13:36:19 PDT Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 5.9 fix went in. Would be most grateful if somebody could do the cherry
> pick and merge. I won't have a keyboard until tomorrow late morning.
5.6: https://codereview.qt-project.org/201945
dev: https://codereview.qt-projec
Hi,
The 5.9 fix went in. Would be most grateful if somebody could do the cherry
pick and merge. I won't have a keyboard until tomorrow late morning.
Simon
On 7. Aug 2017, at 16:56, Simon Hausmann
mailto:simon.hausm...@qt.io>> wrote:
Hi,
A brief update. All qtbase branches are blocked becau
Hi,
A brief update. All qtbase branches are blocked because of
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/201931/ (or the lack thereof).
Once that fix is in 5.9 we'd have to merge it to qtbase dev, to unblock that
(and 5.6). However that will further block qt5.git's dev
as the merge will pull in
