On 25/06/2012, at 4:22 AM, d3fault wrote:
> Apparently I'm smarter than everyone at Nokia. I managed to make a "modern,
> fluid" GUI API using the QSG* classes without incurring the additional costs
> of: JIT Parsing of .qml files, a JavaScript Interpreter, and a Virtual
> Machine. I also did
On 25/06/2012, at 6:25 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:13:04PM -0700, BogDan wrote:
>> +1 This guy looks very stupid to me, but someone else must approve.
>
> That is https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTCREATORBUG-7578 now.
seriously, does this kind of thing belong a
On 25/06/2012, at 5:13 AM, BogDan wrote:
> +1 This guy looks very stupid to me, but someone else must approve.
Code of Conduct *cough*
No personal attacks, please.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mail
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <
oswald.buddenha...@nokia.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:37:27AM +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On segunda-feira, 25 de junho de 2012 09.02.32, Rene Jensen wrote:
> > > Since we have a good tradition of hijacking threads, I'd li
On 25 June 2012 08:02, Rene Jensen wrote:
> Since we have a good tradition of hijacking threads, I'd like to take this
> opportunity to ask if qt-project.org has established an area where usermade
> classes, fragments etc. can reside.
> A central repository just seems more sensible to me.
>
> When
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:37:27AM +0200, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de junho de 2012 09.02.32, Rene Jensen wrote:
> > Since we have a good tradition of hijacking threads, I'd like to take this
> > opportunity to ask if qt-project.org has established an area where usermade
>
On segunda-feira, 25 de junho de 2012 09.02.32, Rene Jensen wrote:
> Since we have a good tradition of hijacking threads, I'd like to take this
> opportunity to ask if qt-project.org has established an area where usermade
> classes, fragments etc. can reside.
> A central repository just seems more
Since we have a good tradition of hijacking threads, I'd like to take this
opportunity to ask if qt-project.org has established an area where usermade
classes, fragments etc. can reside.
A central repository just seems more sensible to me.
When making a project, there's always some small widget or
Yeah. I'd like to see that too, 'cause I am deeply convinced that change opens
up possibilities. Even when it comes in a rude, out the line and rough
packaging. :)
Go man show colours and good luck,
Mike
On Jun 25, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Wolfgang Baron wrote:
> Hi d3fault,
>
> please show us som
Hi d3fault,
please show us some demo of your code and publish an LGPL project for
others to have a look at. Then we can see, whether you've created the
next best thing or not. Sure hope, you've got something there!
___
Development mailing list
Developme
, 2012 10:25 PM
To: BogDan
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] So I've made a QWidgets2 design/prototype... BUT...
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:13:04PM -0700, BogDan wrote:
> +1 This guy looks very stupid to me, but someone else must approve.
That is https://bugre
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 12:13:04PM -0700, BogDan wrote:
> +1 This guy looks very stupid to me, but someone else must approve.
That is https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTCREATORBUG-7578 now.
Andre'
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-proj
QWidgetNG, the last iteration was 4On 6/24/12 21:13 BogDan wrote:
+1 This guy looks very stupid to me, but someone else must approve.
From: d3fault
To: "development@qt-project.org"
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 9:22 PM
Subject: [Development] So I've made a QWidgets2 design/p
+1 This guy looks very stupid to me, but someone else must approve.
>
> From: d3fault
>To: "development@qt-project.org"
>Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2012 9:22 PM
>Subject: [Development] So I've made a QWidgets2 design/prototype.
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, d3fault wrote:
> Which brings me to my next question:
> Why should I do Nokia's work (rather, what I think should be their work)
> for them?
You don't have to. What you may do is to help other users (and in the long
run yourself).
> Sure, I could contribute QWidgets2 as an
Apparently I'm smarter than everyone at Nokia. I managed to make a "modern,
fluid" GUI API using the QSG* classes without incurring the additional
costs of: JIT Parsing of .qml files, a JavaScript Interpreter, and a
Virtual Machine. I also did it without using declarative, something claimed
by many
16 matches
Mail list logo
