On domingo, 1 de maio de 2016 19:35:19 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello
>
The changes are ready for review
https://codereview.qt-project.org/157713
https://codereview.qt-project.org/158944
https://codereview.qt-project.org/158945
https://codereview.qt-project.org/158952
https://codereview.qt-p
On segunda-feira, 2 de maio de 2016 19:07:24 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> Do you mean 64-bit big-endian system, or both 32-bit and 64-bit?
64-bit big endian. On 32-bit it should not enable the optimisation because 32
bits aren't enough bits.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.co
02.05.2016, 10:44, "Thiago Macieira" :
> Hello
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/157714
>
> I've just pushed one large commit that changes QDateTime to support a "short
> QDateTime Optimisation". Inspired by the SSO mechanism used in libc++ and
> similar to what we've done to QVersionNumber,
On segunda-feira, 2 de maio de 2016 08:26:26 PDT Jake Petroules wrote:
> Too bad, I thought I could have helped you here but the MIPS board I just
> bought is LE.
>
> You could always try Debian mips or ppc in qemu. They have prebuilt images.
Don't have time for that.
I'll do a review of the MIP
On May 1, 2016, at 7:35 PM, Thiago Macieira
mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com>> wrote:
Hello
https://codereview.qt-project.org/157714
I've just pushed one large commit that changes QDateTime to support a "short
QDateTime Optimisation". Inspired by the SSO mechanism used in libc++ and
similar to
Hello
https://codereview.qt-project.org/157714
I've just pushed one large commit that changes QDateTime to support a "short
QDateTime Optimisation". Inspired by the SSO mechanism used in libc++ and
similar to what we've done to QVersionNumber, I've made QDateTime not allocate
memory for most u
