> Before the transition to Qt being developed in the open via open governance,
> the Qt Support team back in Trolltech and later Nokia, would prioritize the
> bugs that were created, or at least handled, by them. Typically these would
> be bugs that were brought to our attention by commercial custo
On sexta-feira, 22 de fevereiro de 2013 16.18.13, Michael Hasselmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:15 +, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
> > Our motivation for this is very simple: keep Qt bugs going to one place
> > and avoid fragmentation.
>
> But is that really feasible? You'd have to make sure
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:15 +, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
> Our motivation for this is very simple: keep Qt bugs going to one place
> and avoid fragmentation.
But is that really feasible? You'd have to make sure it's a general Qt
problem first and not related to some interaction with Blackberry
s
On 19.02.13 18:25, "Frederik Gladhorn" wrote:
>See also my mail from two weeks ago ([Development] issue tracker rights).
>
>I think we need to make a few more adjustments and really need more
>people
>with bug triaging rights.
Actually, there is a good reminder, since there were others concerns
Fredag 15. februar 2013 12.47.49 skrev Shaw Andy:
> Hi,
>
> Before the transition to Qt being developed in the open via open governance,
> the Qt Support team back in Trolltech and later Nokia, would prioritize the
> bugs that were created, or at least handled, by them. Typically these would
> be
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Shaw Andy wrote:
> Before the transition to Qt being developed in the open via open governance,
> the Qt Support team back in Trolltech and later Nokia, would prioritize the
> bugs that were created, or at least handled, by them. Typically these would
> be bugs
[snip]
> > What I would like to suggest that we do now is bring back this practice, so
> that the Qt Support team will set a priority on the bugs that it creates or
> handles, so that it makes things easier for the maintainers to actually see
> what issues are potentially a higher priority than th
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Shaw Andy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before the transition to Qt being developed in the open via open governance,
> the Qt Support team back in Trolltech and later Nokia, would prioritize the
> bugs that were created, or at least handled, by them. Typically these would
>
Hi,
Before the transition to Qt being developed in the open via open governance,
the Qt Support team back in Trolltech and later Nokia, would prioritize the
bugs that were created, or at least handled, by them. Typically these would be
bugs that were brought to our attention by commercial custo
