urday, January 20, 2018 9:17:43 AM
To: Thiago Macieira
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Setters: Clarifying the ownership
Please use an already existing solution to this problem :
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Ri-raw
Errors wi
Please use an already existing solution to this problem :
https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#Ri-raw
Errors will be caught by the compiler in case of std::unique_ptr, and by
static analysers (like clang-tidy) for gsl::owner, without run-time cost.
There was
On Friday, 19 January 2018 09:26:10 PST Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Jaroslaw Kobus (19 January 2018 17:09)
>
> > "give" may be confused with "get", which is usually an accessor. I may
> > also think "Am I giving (to QCoreApplication)" or "The
> > QCoreApplication is giving (me)". Maybe it is just a
Jaroslaw Kobus (19 January 2018 17:09)
> "give" may be confused with "get", which is usually an accessor. I may
> also think "Am I giving (to QCoreApplication)" or "The
> QCoreApplication is giving (me)". Maybe it is just a matter of the
> other verb? Absorb, hand over, hand on, suck in, swallow...
19.01.2018, 20:07, "Adam Treat" :
> How about "transfer"
Why not just use move semantics of language instead of inventing new terms?
>
> On 01/19/2018 11:57 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On sexta-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2018 08:26:21 PST Philippe wrote:
>>> +20 years ago, the (good) Taligent
How about "transfer"
On 01/19/2018 11:57 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On sexta-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2018 08:26:21 PST Philippe wrote:
+20 years ago, the (good) Taligent crossplatform project, in its guideline,
proposed:
adopt() aka "take ownership"
orphan() aka "release ownership"
Given tha
On sexta-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2018 08:26:21 PST Philippe wrote:
> +20 years ago, the (good) Taligent crossplatform project, in its guideline,
> proposed:
>
> adopt() aka "take ownership"
>
> orphan() aka "release ownership"
Given that we already have "take" methods that release ownership in
>
>
> From: Development
> on behalf of Jesus Fernandez
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 4:15:52 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Setters: Clarifying the ownership
>
>
r, hand on,
suck in, swallow...
Jarek
From: Development on
behalf of Jesus Fernandez
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 4:15:52 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Setters: Clarifying the ownership
Hi all!
I always found something annoying in the Qt API. The problem comes wit
19.01.2018, 18:16, "Jesus Fernandez" :
> Hi all!
>
> I always found something annoying in the Qt API. The problem comes with the
> setters of our properties. When I want to pass an object to a property I
> never know if I need to take care of the object or relay on parenting system
> to avoid
Hi all!
I always found something annoying in the Qt API. The problem comes with the
setters of our properties. When I want to pass an object to a property I never
know if I need to take care of the object or relay on parenting system to avoid
memory leaks.
To know if the object is going to be r
11 matches
Mail list logo
