On sexta-feira, 24 de junho de 2016 20:02:03 PDT Benjamin TERRIER wrote:
> > 2)
>
> https://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-founda
> tion/
> > says that "Qt 5.7 will not be available under LGPLv2.1 anymore" --
> > Does that mean LICENSE.LGPLv21 should be removed from
Le 14 juin 2016 13:22, "Sze Howe Koh" a écrit :
>
> On 7 May 2016 at 12:20, Joseph Crowell wrote:
> >
> > On 4/05/2016 7:39 PM, Lars Knoll wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02/05/16 14:37, "Development on behalf of Sze Howe Koh"
wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> The LICENSE.GPLvX and LICENSE.LGPL
On 7 May 2016 at 12:20, Joseph Crowell wrote:
>
> On 4/05/2016 7:39 PM, Lars Knoll wrote:
>>
>> On 02/05/16 14:37, "Development on behalf of Sze Howe Koh"
>> > szehowe@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The LICENSE.GPLvX and LICENSE.LGPLvX files from
>>> http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/q
On 4/05/2016 7:39 PM, Lars Knoll wrote:
On 02/05/16 14:37, "Development on behalf of Sze Howe Koh"
wrote:
Hello,
The LICENSE.GPLvX and LICENSE.LGPLvX files from
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/ (and submodules) start with
"The Qt Toolkit is Copyright (C) 2015...", but then they
On 02/05/16 14:37, "Development on behalf of Sze Howe Koh"
wrote:
>Hello,
>
>The LICENSE.GPLvX and LICENSE.LGPLvX files from
>http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/ (and submodules) start with
>"The Qt Toolkit is Copyright (C) 2015...", but then they go on to say
>"You may use, distribute
Hello,
The LICENSE.GPLvX and LICENSE.LGPLvX files from
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/ (and submodules) start with
"The Qt Toolkit is Copyright (C) 2015...", but then they go on to say
"You may use, distribute and copy the Qt GUI Toolkit under the terms
of..."
Is this correct? What abo
