Re: [Development] Runtime Platform Content Selection

2013-01-17 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
On 17 Jan 2013, at 14:35, Sorvig Morten wrote: > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Attila Csipa wrote: > >> On 16/01/13 17:36, Mohamed Fawzi wrote: >>> I am certainly not against the idea of a faster/more efficient static way >>> of choosing resources but it cannot depend on a predetermined di

Re: [Development] Runtime Platform Content Selection

2013-01-17 Thread Sorvig Morten
On Jan 16, 2013, at 5:16 PM, Attila Csipa wrote: > On 16/01/13 17:36, Mohamed Fawzi wrote: >> I am certainly not against the idea of a faster/more efficient static way of >> choosing resources but it cannot depend on a predetermined directory >> ordering. I believe we should rather focus the i

Re: [Development] Runtime Platform Content Selection

2013-01-16 Thread Attila Csipa
On 16/01/13 17:36, Mohamed Fawzi wrote: I am certainly not against the idea of a faster/more efficient static way of choosing resources but it cannot depend on a predetermined directory ordering. I believe we should rather focus the immediate efforts on a subset of the problem, like handling m

Re: [Development] Runtime Platform Content Selection

2013-01-16 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
On 16 Jan 2013, at 10:28, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote: > >> In the Platform Content Selection thread some saw runtime selection as not >> needed. >> I disagree, as I think it could be very useful in some occasions >> (high_res/low_res, differe

Re: [Development] Runtime Platform Content Selection

2013-01-16 Thread Bache-Wiig Jens
On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote: > In the Platform Content Selection thread some saw runtime selection as not > needed. > I disagree, as I think it could be very useful in some occasions > (high_res/low_res, different orientation,…). > I do not believe that having a separate b

Re: [Development] Runtime Platform Content Selection

2013-01-15 Thread Alan Alpert
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote: > In the Platform Content Selection thread some saw runtime selection as not > needed. > I disagree, as I think it could be very useful in some occasions > (high_res/low_res, different orientation,…). > I do not believe that having a separate

[Development] Runtime Platform Content Selection

2013-01-15 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
In the Platform Content Selection thread some saw runtime selection as not needed. I disagree, as I think it could be very useful in some occasions (high_res/low_res, different orientation,…). I do not believe that having a separate binary for all those things is the correct choice. Still the is