Hi,
I have a patch submitted a few weeks ago, intended to add a property
to QQuickDrag to allow set a source size to tell the image provider
the preferred size of the image. Kindly request for review. Thanks!
Patch link: https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtdeclarative/+/518814
--
Developmen
Hi,
I just moved the changes to dev. They fix P2s which is great, but in my opinion
we should target dev by default. If there is agreement that they should go to
other branches, we can move them again.
Cheers,
Frederik
On søndag 29. oktober 2017 20.45.53 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Sunday
On domingo, 29 de outubro de 2017 23:50:01 PDT Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 29/10/2017 22:45, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > I wish I could help in the reviews, but those are not things I understand
> > at all. But I can give this advice: the three changes targetting pre-5.9
> > need to be updated. All
On 29/10/2017 22:45, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I wish I could help in the reviews, but those are not things I understand at
> all. But I can give this advice: the three changes targetting pre-5.9 need to
> be updated. All three should be retargetted at 5.9.
Good to know! I'll resubmit them, thank
On Sunday, 29 October 2017 11:52:02 PDT Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> Hi there!
> I've got a few merge proposals which were recently closed by the Qt
> cleanup bot due to lack of activity; I've reopened them and ping a few
> people, but to no avail.
> All but one are tiny, and I would appreciate if s
Hi there!
I've got a few merge proposals which were recently closed by the Qt
cleanup bot due to lack of activity; I've reopened them and ping a few
people, but to no avail.
All but one are tiny, and I would appreciate if someone could spend a
couple of minutes to give the final +2 or to advise a
Hello guys!
I like CMake and Qt and i initial write and now support CPack IFW generator.
For more project integrations i create sugestion:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTIFW-876
And start work on it:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/165493
It's draft, but any feedback will be appreciate
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 12, 2015 12:59
> *To:* development@qt-project.org
> *Subject:* [Development] Review request for ArrayBuffer+WebSocket/XHR
> (a.k.a Introducing protobuf-qml)
>
> Hello Qt team and community,
>
> Could anyone help me with reviews on ArrayBuffer suppo
ave a chat about it there? :)
Simon
From: Development on behalf of Nobuaki
Sukegawa
Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2015 12:59
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Review request for ArrayBuffer+WebSocket/XHR (a.k.a
Introducing protobuf-qml)
Hel
Hello Qt team and community,
Could anyone help me with reviews on ArrayBuffer support for QtWebSockets
and QtQuick XMLHttpRequest ?
WebSockets:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/125712/
XHR:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/143732/
While I believe these features are generally useful,
10 matches
Mail list logo
