On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 9:30 AM Frederik Gladhorn
wrote:
> (...)
> So please give either tool a chance and let's see if we can reach consensus.
I've tested uncrustify on clazy's code base and I was able to make a
configuration file that adapts 100% to my preferred style, instead of
me changing th
> On 19 Nov 2018, at 21:59, Ville Voutilainen
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 22:41, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:03:06 PST Ville Voutilainen wrote:
>>> I personally tend to split such things after an opening parenthesis.
>>> Getting back to allowing ctor-
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 22:41, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:03:06 PST Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> > I personally tend to split such things after an opening parenthesis.
> > Getting back to allowing ctor-initializers to be written
> > with a comma starting a line, I think
On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:41:46 PST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> It is allowed, unless the maintainer objects to it.
>
> I object to it in QtCore.
I also insist that the opening brace in non-nested classes, enums and in any
functions be placed in a new line (unless the entire function is in one
On Monday, 19 November 2018 12:03:06 PST Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> I personally tend to split such things after an opening parenthesis.
> Getting back to allowing ctor-initializers to be written
> with a comma starting a line, I think we should just allow it; the
> benefit of not having noise in a
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018 at 18:37, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Monday, 19 November 2018 02:34:09 PST Edward Welbourne wrote:
> > I note a glaring exception to that: after the opening parenthesis of
> > a parameter list, if the line would otherwise be too long:
> >
> > auto variable =
> > QCharacter
On Monday, 19 November 2018 02:34:09 PST Edward Welbourne wrote:
> I note a glaring exception to that: after the opening parenthesis of
> a parameter list, if the line would otherwise be too long:
>
> auto variable =
> QCharacteristicallyVerboseClassName::characteristicallyLongFunctionName(
> fi
On Sunday, 18 November 2018 05:30:26 PST Sze Howe Koh wrote:
>> I'd just like to know: Did the Qt Project ever reach a decision? If not,
>> how can we reach one?
(Linked to the discussion of constructor initializers like
MyClass(type param)
: MyBase(param)
, myMember(param)
using comma
On Sunday, 18 November 2018 05:30:26 PST Sze Howe Koh wrote:
> I'd just like to know: Did the Qt Project ever reach a decision? If not,
> how can we reach one?
I don't think we did. Right now, it's up to the maintainer's discretion.
QtCore opts into the rule: newlines are whitespace.
Corollary:
Hi all,
I can't find a final decision on this topic:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-June/026058.html
The arguments from both sides were numerous (browse through
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2016-June/thread.html ).
I would like to avoid a re-hash of th
10 matches
Mail list logo
