Re: [Development] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine

2021-01-29 Thread Karsten Heimrich
hort term before the FF. -- Karsten From: Development On Behalf Of Karsten Heimrich Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 10:50 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [Development] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine Hi, with Qt6 we removed the QtStateMachine implementation from qt

Re: [Development] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine

2021-01-21 Thread Ulf Hermann
with Qt6 we removed the QtStateMachine implementation  from qtbase and moved it into qtscxml. While the name was ok when the module contained only SCXML releated code, it contains now both state machine implementations. Hence I would like to propose/request to rename the module to qtstatemachin

Re: [Development] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine

2021-01-21 Thread Jaroslaw Kobus
] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine Karsten Heimrich (21 January 2021 10:49) wrote: > [...] I would like to propose/request to rename the module to > qtstatemachine to reflect the widened code base. Jira task: > QTBUG-89837 Sounds like a more accessible name to me - I'

Re: [Development] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine

2021-01-21 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 21 Jan 2021, at 11:14, Edward Welbourne wrote: > > Karsten Heimrich (21 January 2021 10:49) wrote: >> [...] I would like to propose/request to rename the module to >> qtstatemachine to reflect the widened code base. Jira task: >> QTBUG-89837 > > Sounds like a more accessible name to me - I

Re: [Development] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine

2021-01-21 Thread Edward Welbourne
Karsten Heimrich (21 January 2021 10:49) wrote: > [...] I would like to propose/request to rename the module to > qtstatemachine to reflect the widened code base. Jira task: > QTBUG-89837 Sounds like a more accessible name to me - I'd have had to look up SCXML to find out what it means, where the

[Development] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine

2021-01-21 Thread Karsten Heimrich
Hi, with Qt6 we removed the QtStateMachine implementation from qtbase and moved it into qtscxml. While the name was ok when the module contained only SCXML releated code, it contains now both state machine implementations. Hence I would like to propose/request to rename the module to qtstatema