hort term before the FF.
-- Karsten
From: Development On Behalf Of Karsten
Heimrich
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 10:50 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine
Hi,
with Qt6 we removed the QtStateMachine implementation from qt
with Qt6 we removed the QtStateMachine implementation from qtbase and
moved it into qtscxml. While the name was ok when the module contained
only SCXML releated code, it contains now both state machine
implementations. Hence I would like to propose/request to rename the
module to qtstatemachin
] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine
Karsten Heimrich (21 January 2021 10:49) wrote:
> [...] I would like to propose/request to rename the module to
> qtstatemachine to reflect the widened code base. Jira task:
> QTBUG-89837
Sounds like a more accessible name to me - I'
> On 21 Jan 2021, at 11:14, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> Karsten Heimrich (21 January 2021 10:49) wrote:
>> [...] I would like to propose/request to rename the module to
>> qtstatemachine to reflect the widened code base. Jira task:
>> QTBUG-89837
>
> Sounds like a more accessible name to me - I
Karsten Heimrich (21 January 2021 10:49) wrote:
> [...] I would like to propose/request to rename the module to
> qtstatemachine to reflect the widened code base. Jira task:
> QTBUG-89837
Sounds like a more accessible name to me - I'd have had to look up SCXML
to find out what it means, where the
Hi,
with Qt6 we removed the QtStateMachine implementation from qtbase and moved it
into qtscxml. While the name was ok when the module contained only SCXML
releated code, it contains now both state machine implementations. Hence I
would like to propose/request to rename the module to qtstatema