On 29.01.2013 13:12, Jason McDonald wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Sergio Ahumada
> wrote:
>> On 01/29/2013 12:57 PM, Jason McDonald wrote:
>>> I think there is a problem here. The announcement in the link seems
>>> to indicate that the intention was only to present non-approvers with
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Sergio Ahumada
wrote:
> On 01/29/2013 12:57 PM, Jason McDonald wrote:
>> I think there is a problem here. The announcement in the link seems
>> to indicate that the intention was only to present non-approvers with
>> a "Merge patchset x to Staging" button once th
On 29 January 2013 20:00, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> On 01/29/2013 12:57 PM, Jason McDonald wrote:
> > I think there is a problem here. The announcement in the link seems
> > to indicate that the intention was only to present non-approvers with
> > a "Merge patchset x to Staging" button once the com
Hi,
On 01/29/2013 12:57 PM, Jason McDonald wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Sergio Ahumada
> wrote:
>> On 01/28/2013 03:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> Seems currently everybody could merge to staging.
>>> I as non-approver have a merge button in gerrit.
>>>
>>> Or is this only a new fea
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Sergio Ahumada
wrote:
> On 01/28/2013 03:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Seems currently everybody could merge to staging.
>> I as non-approver have a merge button in gerrit.
>>
>> Or is this only a new feature to see if the
>> request passes all tests?
>>
>> Peter
On 01/28/2013 03:52 PM, Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Seems currently everybody could merge to staging.
> I as non-approver have a merge button in gerrit.
>
> Or is this only a new feature to see if the
> request passes all tests?
>
> Peter
see
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2013-Janua
Seems currently everybody could merge to staging.
I as non-approver have a merge button in gerrit.
Or is this only a new feature to see if the
request passes all tests?
Peter
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-projec