On 12/15/11 3:53 PM, "ext lars.kn...@nokia.com"
wrote:
>
>On 12/12/11 6:21 PM, "ext Robin Burchell" wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Rohan McGovern
>> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately the qtwebkit pointed at by qt5.git is outdated and known
>>> not to work.
>>
>>Given that webkit is developed
On Thursday, December 15, 2011 07:53:29 AM Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 12/12/11 6:21 PM, "ext Robin Burchell" wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Rohan McGovern
> >
> > wrote:
> >> Unfortunately the qtwebkit pointed at by qt5.git is outdated and known
> >> not to work.
> >
> >Given that webkit i
On 12/12/11 6:21 PM, "ext Robin Burchell" wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Rohan McGovern
> wrote:
>> Unfortunately the qtwebkit pointed at by qt5.git is outdated and known
>> not to work.
>
>Given that webkit is developed upstream inside webkit.org, I'd second
>that there's no reason ha
On Dec 13, 2011, at 2:26 AM, Rohan McGovern wrote:
> Robin Burchell said:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Rohan McGovern
>> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately the qtwebkit pointed at by qt5.git is outdated and known
>>> not to work.
True, which we plan to improve very soon.
>>
>> Given that webkit
Robin Burchell said:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Rohan McGovern
> wrote:
> > Unfortunately the qtwebkit pointed at by qt5.git is outdated and known
> > not to work.
>
> Given that webkit is developed upstream inside webkit.org, I'd second
> that there's no reason having it there, aside per