On 12/30/2011 10:48 AM, ext Stephen Kelly wrote:
> The ref counted quit feature I was working on was vetoed. At the moment
> it looks like Qt will not get a ref counted quit feature. It is blocked
> because no solution has been proposed.
A different proposal: Why not just abstract the relevant bit
On Monday, 2 de January de 2012 16.47.50, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> If wake locks are as simple as you describe though, it sounds like
> something similar would work just fine.
That might be. I was actually hoping you'd spend an hour to investigate what
it takes.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieir
On Monday, January 02, 2012 12:44:19 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I'm asking for an outside class at a minimum. Some discussion on IRC:
>
> 11:30 <+ossi> well, at least the proxy objects allow some kind of
> discoverability
> 11:31 <+ossi> "wtf is this not quitting? let's consult the list of
> registe
On Monday, 2 de January de 2012 14.39.40, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Monday, January 02, 2012 10:51:31 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Does the manager keep track of its delegates?
> >
> > Good question. I guess it would depend on the windowing system, if we have
> > a notification of remote windows be
On Monday, 2 de January de 2012 14.47.20, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > > > It sounds like the QCoreApplication object will be deleted when the
> > > > count reaches zero, which isn't true.
> > >
> > > Yes, it is true.
> >
> > To be clear: are you agreeing with me ("what you said is true") or are you
On Monday 02 January 2012 11:34:36 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday, 2 de January de 2012 14.25.17, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > ref() means "keep the application alive until i call deref()
> >
> > And every ref() must be paired with a deref()
> > exactly like QSharedData ref. that is i hink a
On Monday, January 02, 2012 10:51:31 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Does the manager keep track of its delegates?
>
> Good question. I guess it would depend on the windowing system, if we have a
> notification of remote windows being closed. I'd like it to be automatic,
> of course. Also, programmatic
On Monday, 2 de January de 2012 14.25.17, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> ref() means "keep the application alive until i call deref()
> And every ref() must be paired with a deref()
> exactly like QSharedData ref. that is i hink a concept that is very common
> and easy to understand.
>
> After, it can
On Monday 02 January 2012 10:51:31 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I don't see a need to expose the actual integer count of windows.
It is not exposed. ref() and deref() returns void.
> I really don't like "ref/deref" in QCoreApplication, as it doesn't make much
> sense.
It does:
ref() mean
On Monday, 2 de January de 2012 13.01.36, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> What does the 'delegate side' API look like?
Nothing. This object would be created and, when it's "closed", if it's the
last window, the application should quit.
> Does your proposal require QGuiApplication or is QCoreApplication en
On Sunday, January 01, 2012 23:21:33 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > To fix the front-end API we need to find out what the use-cases are
> > > that we're trying to solve. So far, I've only heard one: preventing
> > > an application from quitting while it has out-of-process windows
> > > open.>
> > We
On Sunday 01 January 2012 23:21:33 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 30 de December de 2011 08.12.58, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > As the current API is a low-level API, you can put any front-end API you
> > wish on top as an alternative. I'm not convinced that would solve any
> > problems though. I
On Friday, 30 de December de 2011 08.12.58, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> As the current API is a low-level API, you can put any front-end API you
> wish on top as an alternative. I'm not convinced that would solve any
> problems though. I don't think you've proposed a concrete enough front-end
> API to e
On Friday 30 December 2011 01:48:12 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The ref counted quit feature I was working on was vetoed. At the moment it
> looks like Qt will not get a ref counted quit feature. It is blocked because
> no solution has been proposed.
>
> http://codereview.qt-project.org/#chang
On Thursday, December 29, 2011 23:33:35 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday, 30 de December de 2011 01.48.12, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The ref counted quit feature I was working on was vetoed. At the moment
> > it looks like Qt will not get a ref counted quit feature. It is blocked
> >
On Friday, 30 de December de 2011 01.48.12, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The ref counted quit feature I was working on was vetoed. At the moment it
> looks like Qt will not get a ref counted quit feature. It is blocked because
> no solution has been proposed.
>
> http://codereview.qt-project.org/
Hi,
The ref counted quit feature I was working on was vetoed. At the moment it
looks like Qt will not get a ref counted quit feature. It is blocked because
no solution has been proposed.
http://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,10408
I'm just moving the discussion here. I know asiego is not s
17 matches
Mail list logo
