[Development] QtWeb and the tree

2011-10-28 Thread Dhaivat Pandya
How was this made? http://wiki.qt-project.org/images/9/9c/OpenGovernance-Qt.png I would like to add QtWeb and its QtFCGI subproject to it, since those have been decided to be added on once we have a basic FCGI system going. ___ Development mailing list D

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-27 Thread Dhaivat Pandya
So, as far as I see it, we will not be needing the Filter, or Access Control mechanisms for FCGI (at least to begin with), what do you guys say? On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote: > I also agree. Javascript just never occurred to me... > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Ma

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-26 Thread Dhaivat Pandya
I also agree. Javascript just never occurred to me... On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Mark Constable wrote: > On 2011-10-25 11:32 PM, Gábor Lehel wrote: > > > Lastly, ties to a scripting language would be excellent, and it > > > would be great if we could start with Lua since it is dead simple

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-25 Thread Mark Constable
On 2011-10-25 11:32 PM, Gábor Lehel wrote: > > Lastly, ties to a scripting language would be excellent, and it > > would be great if we could start with Lua since it is dead simple > > to tie in with C/C++ code, and then add Python capability as we > > get going farther into the project. > > I am

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-25 Thread Gábor Lehel
2011/10/25 Dhaivat Pandya : > So, the general sentiment is something like an MVC type framework, so, we > will most likely work on that. > If you want to be a part of this, please fork this > repo: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb > I will accept pull requests if they make any remotest idea of "se

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-25 Thread Dhaivat Pandya
So, the general sentiment is something like an MVC type framework, so, we will most likely work on that. If you want to be a part of this, please fork this repo: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb I will accept pull requests if they make any remotest idea of "sense" right now, since we dont' have

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-25 Thread jeremy . laine
Not sure if it is of interest if your focus is on fcgi but I have a qt-based http server I'd be happy to contribute: http://opensource.bolloretelecom.eu/projects/qdjango/browser/src/QDjangoHttpServer.h Am at qtdd11 if you want to talk. -- Jeremy On 25/10/11 04:38 Dhaivat Pandya wrote: QtWeb:

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-25 Thread Radu - Ionut Kurta
I would suggest going for an mvc framework as a wt like framework already exist namely wt and a ruby on rails like framework will have a greater success imho. -- My programs never have bugs, they just develop random features. -- C/C++ ... I don't see a huge difference between them, and the 'benef

Re: [Development] QtWeb

2011-10-24 Thread Mark Constable
On 2011-10-24 09:38 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote: > QtWeb: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb > > Web framework for Qt, right now, all we have decided is the FastCGI > base. These might help with the webserver itself... https://github.com/nikhilm/qhttpserver (the above uses NodeJS's http://github.co

[Development] QtWeb

2011-10-24 Thread Dhaivat Pandya
QtWeb: https://gitorious.org/qtweb/qtweb Web framework for Qt, right now, all we have decided is the FastCGI base. Either it can be a Wt style framework with Qt components, or, a more traditional MVC framework (more community support on the latter, so that is mostly likely the POA). Fork, commit