Re: [Development] QtWaylandCompositor public api

2015-09-11 Thread Paul Olav Tvete
On Wednesday 9. September 2015 18.13.55 Thomas Senyk wrote: > How stable/done is this? Is it worth while trying to port an existing > compositor to the new API? It's in active API review, and we're still tearing down some of the classes. Right now, we are removing absolute positions from the API,

Re: [Development] QtWaylandCompositor public api

2015-09-09 Thread Thomas Senyk
On 31.08.2015 15:46, Lind Jorgen wrote: > Hi all. > > On Friday I pushed some patches to a branch called > wip-compositor-api in the qtwayland repository. We want this branch > to be the basis for a technology preview of the QtWaylandCompositor > api. The branch has minimal fixes to the client sid

[Development] QtWaylandCompositor public api

2015-08-31 Thread Lind Jorgen
Hi all. On Friday I pushed some patches to a branch called wip-compositor-api in the qtwayland repository. We want this branch to be the basis for a technology preview of the QtWaylandCompositor api. The branch has minimal fixes to the client side of the code, and mostly concentrates on restruc