Re: [Development] QtV8 and the unittests

2011-12-11 Thread christopher.adams
Hi Holger, > > Hi again, > > > > the previous points are not answered but I have one more question. Why > > do we need to have the QML_GLOBAL_INDEX slot and carry it around? > Why > > can't we just patch src/contexts.cc with the current code but resolve > > the qml_global and qml_global_global thr

Re: [Development] QtV8 and the unittests

2011-12-10 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On 11/29/2011 01:46 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On 11/22/2011 10:57 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: >> On 11/22/2011 06:49 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > > Hi again, > > the previous points are not answered but I have one more question. Why do we > need to have the QML_

Re: [Development] QtV8 and the unittests

2011-11-29 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On 11/22/2011 10:57 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On 11/22/2011 06:49 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: Hi again, the previous points are not answered but I have one more question. Why do we need to have the QML_GLOBAL_INDEX slot and carry it around? Why can't we just patch src/cont

Re: [Development] QtV8 and the unittests

2011-11-22 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
On 11/22/2011 06:49 PM, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to run QtDeclarative on MIPS and I will need to apply the QML changes > for this backend. I wonder about the pro/cons of having implementation and > tests separated in two different repositories. Hi Aaron, I think the

[Development] QtV8 and the unittests

2011-11-22 Thread Holger Hans Peter Freyther
Hi all, I want to run QtDeclarative on MIPS and I will need to apply the QML changes for this backend. I wonder about the pro/cons of having implementation and tests separated in two different repositories. Pro: The tests can be run with the normal Qt autotests, no other buildsystem needed (Gyp/S