On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:46 PM, André Pönitz
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:48:18PM +0200, Juergen Bocklage-Ryannel wrote:
>> On 24.07.13 5:41 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> > Since I can't seem to get them to speak up, I guess they don't care
>> > that much after all. I'll withdraw the suggesti
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:48:18PM +0200, Juergen Bocklage-Ryannel wrote:
> On 24.07.13 5:41 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> > Since I can't seem to get them to speak up, I guess they don't care
> > that much after all. I'll withdraw the suggestion again.
> >
> > See you in six months :P
> >
> Sorry haven
On 24.07.13 5:41 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> Since I can't seem to get them to speak up, I guess they don't care
> that much after all. I'll withdraw the suggestion again.
>
> See you in six months :P
>
Sorry haven't seen this thread. I'm working in several customer projects
now using purely QML/JS.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> My KMail is configured for expiring dev emails after 90 days (the oldest
> email
> in the folder is from April 22). There are 1050 emails right now.
>
> 1050 / 90 = 11.6667
>
Ah, ok. I only checked the thread numbers apparently as the gma
On sexta-feira, 19 de julho de 2013 02.42.32, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Do people agree it's high? Right now, we have a 350 emails / month average
> > for
> > the past 3 months (11-12 emails a day).
>
> I do not see 11-12 emails a day. How did you get that?
My KMail is configured for expiring dev em
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 18 de julho de 2013 08.07.02, Alan Alpert wrote:
> > There were some specific KDE people then whom I had been talking to at
> > DevDays who did not participate through the development ML on those
> > topics, despite being i
On quinta-feira, 18 de julho de 2013 08.07.02, Alan Alpert wrote:
> There were some specific KDE people then whom I had been talking to at
> DevDays who did not participate through the development ML on those
> topics, despite being interested in previous conversations. After
> having more excellen
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As for user questions, there is already the interest mailing list, and
> for
> > development... wasn't it okay when you sent a set of emails in here last
> > time in a similar scenario and there was a significant amount
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You haven't even addressed any of the arguments, which are the same as
>
the ones you (implicitly) agreed with about the IRC channels.
>
Alan, it is not the same, for me, at least. I have always considered the
qml/quick
