People seem to be generally in favor, so moving the discussion to
codereview: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,43607 .
I'm aware that a lot of people are on holiday break, so these changes
won't be merged for two weeks at the earliest. Gives most people who
want to look the chance to do s
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Martin Jones
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Finally Qt 5 brings better QtQml and QtQuick separation! Better, not
>> perfect. The main things I've heard are missing is dynamic
>> instantiation of non-Items. Wha
Alan spaketh:
> Finally Qt 5 brings better QtQml and QtQuick separation! Better, not
perfect. The main things I've heard are missing is dynamic
> instantiation of non-Items. What I propose is a new element for the
> QtQml module which provides that functionality. Note that while some
> people ha
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Finally Qt 5 brings better QtQml and QtQuick separation! Better, not
> perfect. The main things I've heard are missing is dynamic
> instantiation of non-Items. What I propose is a new element for the
> QtQml module which p
Finally Qt 5 brings better QtQml and QtQuick separation! Better, not
perfect. The main things I've heard are missing is dynamic
instantiation of non-Items. What I propose is a new element for the
QtQml module which provides that functionality. Note that while some
people have suggested that Repeate
