Em sex 20 jun 2014, às 06:59:35, Rutledge Shawn escreveu:
> > I don't see how they'd do that. In order to dlopen anything, we need a C
> > API.
> Supposedly it can be done even with C++, with some caveats:
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1067346/alternatives-to-dlsym-and-dlopen->
> in-c ht
On 13 Jun 2014, at 17:26, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em sex 13 jun 2014, às 05:52:57, Rutledge Shawn escreveu:
>>> It makes no sense to build Qt without any platform plugin, for example.
>>> The plugins must stay with QtGui, which implies that QtCore, QtNetwork
>>> and QtDBus must too.
>>
>> But
On Thursday 12 of June 2014 18:24:38 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > if we modularize the repos more, we need to go full monty and modularize
> > > *everything*.
> > > i really wouldn't want to do that with the current build system.
> >
> >
> >
> > I guess it would be a nice long term goal.
>
> I'm
Em sáb 14 jun 2014, às 07:18:45, Lorn Potter escreveu:
> On 12/06/2014 8:49 am, Richard Moore wrote:
> > The notes from the network session are online at
> > http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2014/wiki/QtCS14QtNetw
> > ork for those who couldn't attend (or those who did but can't
On 12/06/2014 8:49 am, Richard Moore wrote:
> The notes from the network session are online at
> http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2014/wiki/QtCS14QtNetwork
> for those who couldn't attend (or those who did but can't remember what
> we said). Thanks to Danimo for minuting this.
D
Em sex 13 jun 2014, às 05:52:57, Rutledge Shawn escreveu:
> > It makes no sense to build Qt without any platform plugin, for example.
> > The plugins must stay with QtGui, which implies that QtCore, QtNetwork
> > and QtDBus must too.
>
> But maybe the platform plugins’ dependencies on d-bus could
On 13 Jun 2014, at 03:24, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em qui 12 jun 2014, às 12:21:32, Jędrzej Nowacki escreveu:
>> On Thursday 12 of June 2014 11:47:49 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:40:03AM +0200, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for sending the notes :
Em qui 12 jun 2014, às 12:21:32, Jędrzej Nowacki escreveu:
> On Thursday 12 of June 2014 11:47:49 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:40:03AM +0200, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Thanks for sending the notes :-) I have a question about this point:
> > > > Move
On Thursday 12 of June 2014 11:47:49 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:40:03AM +0200, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for sending the notes :-) I have a question about this point:
> > > Move QtNetowrk into its own git modules
> > >
> > >Thiago: Network can
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:40:03AM +0200, Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for sending the notes :-) I have a question about this point:
>
> > Move QtNetowrk into its own git modules
> >Thiago: Network cannot swapped out into its own module, due to dbus
> >reqiring it in the futu
Hi,
Thanks for sending the notes :-) I have a question about this point:
> Move QtNetowrk into its own git modules
>Thiago: Network cannot swapped out into its own module, due to dbus
>reqiring it in the future
Why dbus can not be moved to a separate module or together with networking
The notes from the network session are online at
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2014/wiki/QtCS14QtNetwork
for those who couldn't attend (or those who did but can't remember what we
said). Thanks to Danimo for minuting this.
Cheers
Rich.
___
12 matches
Mail list logo
