On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:48:07PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 June 2015 21:57:53 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > > * Qt 5.6 will deprecate: QNX 6.5 (QNX 6.6 OK)
> > > * Qt 5.6 will deprecate WEC 7, 2013 only.
> >
> > Deprecate or drop them? From the C++11 thread I understood they w
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 21:57:53 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > * Qt 5.6 will deprecate: QNX 6.5 (QNX 6.6 OK)
> > * Qt 5.6 will deprecate WEC 7, 2013 only.
>
> Deprecate or drop them? From the C++11 thread I understood they will
> be completely dropped due to lack of compilers.
The changelog says "
On Tuesday 16 June 2015 21:50:29 Robin Burchell wrote:
> * Qt 5.6 will deprecate: QNX 6.5 (QNX 6.6 OK)
> * Qt 5.6 will deprecate WEC 7, 2013 only.
> * Qt 5.6: Vista is on life support - patches welcome, it won’t be tested
> * Qt 5.6: OS X 10.8+ (previous 4 releases)
> * Qt 5.6: RHEL 6.6 with devpac
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> * Deprecation is hard: lots of use of “old"RHEL 6 still going on. At the
> same time, why is there a desire to use the newest Qt on these “old”
> platforms?
Because these platforms constitute big "standards" for development of
a complex sys
Notes I took on the deprecation session follow. If I missed anything, or
misrepresented it in the notes, please chime in -- I was pretty tired
when I was writing this :)
(P.S. Did someone take notes on the QtQuick Performance discussion?)
==
Introduction
* Qt 5 is now a few years old, a lot
