Re: [Development] Qt and gcc5

2015-05-28 Thread Knoll Lars
On 28/05/15 22:11, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On Thursday 28 May 2015 21:49:57 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: >> Slightly offtopic. Reading the link they have an interesting idea about >>ABI >> tagging method interfaces. Could we use that in Qt too, when introducing >> new variants of methods, for

Re: [Development] Qt and gcc5

2015-05-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 28 May 2015 21:49:57 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > Slightly offtopic. Reading the link they have an interesting idea about ABI > tagging method interfaces. Could we use that in Qt too, when introducing > new variants of methods, for instance to replace the constexpr hacks? I haven't

Re: [Development] Qt and gcc5

2015-05-28 Thread Allan Sandfeld Jensen
On Thursday 28 May 2015, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Thursday 28 May 2015 14:51:50 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > On Thursday 28 May 2015 13:07:10 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > > Does anyone has any insight with respect to Qt 4 and/or 5 and [link]? > > > > > > [li

Re: [Development] Qt and gcc5

2015-05-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 28 May 2015 14:51:50 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Thursday 28 May 2015 13:07:10 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Does anyone has any insight with respect to Qt 4 and/or 5 and [link]? > > > > [link]

Re: [Development] Qt and gcc5

2015-05-28 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Thursday 28 May 2015 13:07:10 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Does anyone has any insight with respect to Qt 4 and/or 5 and [link]? > > [link] > > IE, do we also suffer from BIC by switching to gcc5? Although "sta

[Development] Qt and gcc5

2015-05-28 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Does anyone has any insight with respect to Qt 4 and/or 5 and [link]? [link] IE, do we also suffer from BIC by switching to gcc5? I was also told that Fedora guys have found BICs even if the old ABI was kept, but I haven't asked