Lars Knoll (21 April 2017 10:10)
> Let us know once the updated diffs are available. No point doing the review
> on the old diffs.
Done :-)
Eddy.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listin
> On 21 Apr 2017, at 10:08, Edward Welbourne wrote:
>
> Lars Knoll (20 April 2017 12:19)
>> Some of the diffs don’t look like they are 100% up to date. Eddy?
>
> Indeed, I've just been updating them on request.
> I do plan on a bulk update today.
Thanks! Let us know once the updated diffs are
Lars Knoll (20 April 2017 12:19)
> Some of the diffs don’t look like they are 100% up to date. Eddy?
Indeed, I've just been updating them on request.
I do plan on a bulk update today.
Eddy.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
Some of the diffs don’t look like they are 100% up to date. Eddy?
Lars
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 11:43, Jani Heikkinen wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> It is time to do official Header diff for Qt 5.9 APIs (compared to Qt 5.8.0)
>
> From here you can find the diffs:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/
Hi all,
It is time to do official Header diff for Qt 5.9 APIs (compared to Qt 5.8.0)
>From here you can find the diffs:
>https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/branch:5.9+topic:%22API+Review%22,n,z
>(thanks to Eddy!)
Please do the review now if not done yet. We should get '+2' for each submodul
