On 19/11/14 11:59, "Knoll Lars" wrote:
>>API and style mistake -- the new constructor should very likely be
>>protected (useful only from subclasses?), but the private should be
>>passed by reference (or "QOpenGLPaintDevice(0)" gives a cryptic error):
>>
>>> class Q_GUI_EXPORT QOpenGLPaintDevic
On 19/11/14 10:43, "Giuseppe D'Angelo" wrote:
>ABI break (changing a private static in a public exported class)?
>
>> --- a/src/gui/text/qfontdatabase.h
>> +++ b/src/gui/text/qfontdatabase.h
>> @@ -160,14 +152,14 @@ private:
>> static void createDatabase();
>> static void parseFontName(
ABI break (changing a private static in a public exported class)?
--- a/src/gui/text/qfontdatabase.h
+++ b/src/gui/text/qfontdatabase.h
@@ -160,14 +152,14 @@ private:
static void createDatabase();
static void parseFontName(const QString &name, QString &foundry, QString
&family);
Il 19/11/2014 01:23, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
On Tuesday 18 November 2014 16:38:33 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
Attaching simpler diff.
The diff is still huge because it trips over a massive change in Khronos
headers, which are 3rd party -- we have no control over those. Should we
move them
