Hi all,
This is a kindly reminder that 5.3 feature freeze is nearing... There is only
less than two weeks to finalize new features for 5.3 (Qt 5.3 schedule:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5.3-release )
There is also a wiki page for Qt 5.3 new features. Please start adding those
here: http://qt
On 17 January 2014 19:49, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> So, based on the feedback, can everybody agree on QtWebSockets being an
> add-on?
> It keeps the core as is, and provides an opt-in for applications that need it.
+1 from me. I think it's a good addition to the framework.
Rich.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kur
On 01/17/2014 08:49 PM, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> So, based on the feedback, can everybody agree on QtWebSockets being an
> add-on?
> It keeps the core as is, and provides an opt-in for applications that need it.
+1, this sounds like the best solution to me...
Peter
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kurt
>
>> On 17 J
> On 17 Jan 2014, at 12:13, Blasche Alexander
> wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> Alex
>
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>Hello,
>>
>>If it's currently a separate module, which compiles by itself and can be
>> used by itself, why not adding it as an
So, based on the feedback, can everybody agree on QtWebSockets being an add-on?
It keeps the core as is, and provides an opt-in for applications that need it.
Cheers,
Kurt
> On 17 Jan 2014, at 12:25, Richard Moore wrote:
>
>> On 17 January 2014 07:54, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>
>> From a feature p
On 17 Jan 2014, at 10:30, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
> (removing releasing and other dev subscribed folks from CC)
>
> On Thursday 16. January 2014 12.51.28 Kurt Pattyn wrote:
>> I would like to propose the QtWebSockets module as a new feature for Qt 5.3
>> (see https://qt.gitorious.org/qtplaygro
--
Alex
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:49 AM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> If it's currently a separate module, which compiles by itself and can be
> used by itself, why not adding it as an add-on?
>
> I have started to use Qt on mobile and while 200 more KB
t;
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Kurt
>>
>>
>> Peter and Rich, and comments from your side?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Lars
>>
>> On 16/01/14 19:41, "Steve Gold" wrote:
>>
>>I recommend that it be included in Qt 5.3 as part of th
Pattyn
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 16, 2014 6:51 AM
> *To:* development@qt-project.org
> *Cc:* Heikkinen Jani ;
> mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com ;
> richmoor...@gmail.com ; releas...@qt-project.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Development] Qt 5.3 Feature freeze is coming quite s
(removing releasing and other dev subscribed folks from CC)
On Thursday 16. January 2014 12.51.28 Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> I would like to propose the QtWebSockets module as a new feature for Qt 5.3
> (see https://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/websockets/source/master)
>
> There are a number of requ
On Friday 17 January 2014 09:19:12 Helmut Mülner wrote:
> Will Qt 5.3 cointain Qt3D (finally)?
That is the plan.
Sean
--
Dr Sean Harmer | sean.har...@kdab.com | Managing Director UK
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company
Tel. Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322)
KDAB
On 17 Jan 2014, at 10:01, Peter Hartmann wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 08:54 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> From a feature point of view it would fit best into Qt Network. But
>> it's a sizeable piece of code added to Qt Network. Do you have any
>> numbers on how this changes the size of Qt Network?
>>
>> P
On 01/17/2014 08:54 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> From a feature point of view it would fit best into Qt Network. But
> it's a sizeable piece of code added to Qt Network. Do you have any
> numbers on how this changes the size of Qt Network?
>
> Peter and Rich, and comments from your side?
Size-wise I t
On Friday 17 January 2014 09:19:12 Helmut Mülner
wrote:
> Will Qt 5.3 cointain Qt3D (finally)?
>
> Hopefully
I'd love to see that included in 5.3 as well!
Cheers, René
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/
Will Qt 5.3 cointain Qt3D (finally)?
Hopefully
Helmut Mülner
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
ment@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org>
Cc: Heikkinen Jani<mailto:jani.heikki...@digia.com> ;
mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com ;
richmoor...@gmail.com<mailto:richmoor...@gmail.com> ;
releas...@qt-project.org<mailto:releas...@qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Developmen
ject.org
> Cc: Heikkinen Jani ; mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com ; richmoor...@gmail.com
> ; releas...@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.3 Feature freeze is coming quite soon...
>
> I would like to propose the QtWebSockets module as a new feature for Qt 5.3
> (see https://qt
ment@qt-project.org>
Cc: Heikkinen Jani<mailto:jani.heikki...@digia.com> ;
mailto:thiago.macie...@intel.com ;
richmoor...@gmail.com<mailto:richmoor...@gmail.com> ;
releas...@qt-project.org<mailto:releas...@qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.3 Feature freeze is coming qu
Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.3 Feature freeze is coming quite soon...
I would like to propose the QtWebSockets module as a new feature for Qt 5.3
(see https://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/websockets/source/master)
There are a number of requests in Jira:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/issues
I would like to propose the QtWebSockets module as a new feature for Qt 5.3
(see https://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/websockets/source/master)
There are a number of requests in Jira:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%20websockets asking
to include web socket functiona
Hi all,
I want to remind you all that Qt 5.3 feature freeze is coming pretty soon.
Feature freeze for Qt 5.3 is 14th Feb 2014 so there is only 4 weeks left for
implementing new features.
Qt 5.3 schedule can be found here: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-5.3-release .
There is also link to the Qt
21 matches
Mail list logo
