On sábado, 15 de dezembro de 2012 11.37.19, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> 2012/12/14 Thiago Macieira :
> > Binary renaming is not supported. If you rename binaries, then the
> > qtchooser tool will not help you. You're entirely on your own if you do
> > that and, mind you, the Qt documentation and all Qt s
2012/12/14 Thiago Macieira :
> Binary renaming is not supported. If you rename binaries, then the qtchooser
> tool will not help you. You're entirely on your own if you do that and, mind
> you, the Qt documentation and all Qt support forums and channels will be
> giving the wrong advice.
>
> Theref
On sexta-feira, 14 de dezembro de 2012 15.27.23, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> 2012/12/13 Stephen Kelly :
> >> I'd simply go for putting the binaries into a separate directory as
> >> discussed. The only side effect is that developers using Qt 5.0 will need
> >> to adjust their path to get qmake from Qt 5.
2012/12/13 Stephen Kelly :
>> I'd simply go for putting the binaries into a separate directory as
>> discussed. The only side effect is that developers using Qt 5.0 will need
>> to adjust their path to get qmake from Qt 5. Once the chooser is available
>> that problem will solve itself.
>
> And if
On quinta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2012 17.41.58, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Thursday, December 13, 2012 08:16:41 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On quinta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2012 15.04.31, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > > And if you set that path using the configure switch for it (-bindir?),
> > > the
>
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 08:16:41 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2012 15.04.31, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > And if you set that path using the configure switch for it (-bindir?), the
> > CMake files should be generated with the correct paths already without
> > patch
On quinta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2012 15.04.31, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> And if you set that path using the configure switch for it (-bindir?), the
> CMake files should be generated with the correct paths already without
> patching. That is why I ask how you set the location of the mkspec files -
On quarta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2012 17.28.59, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Thaigo, if that tool is a requirement for packagers, why is it not a
> release blocker for Qt 5.0? What do you expect packagers to do?
It is. I plan on releasing it by the end of the week.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.maciei
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 13:37:16 you wrote:
> On Dec 13, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > The wrapper tool does not exist yet, and Qt 5.0 might be released without
> > it. That'll be something for you to deal with then. :)
>
> I'd simply go for putting the binaries into a separa
On Dec 13, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:50:30 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>> 2012/12/12 Stephen Kelly :
>>> https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-proper
>>
>> o/
>>
>>> and finding that they were installing broken cmake files as a resul
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:50:30 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> 2012/12/12 Stephen Kelly :
> > https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-proper
>
> o/
>
> > and finding that they were installing broken cmake files as a result of
> > renaming the binaries and moving the mkspecs.
>
>
2012/12/12 Stephen Kelly :
> https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-proper
o/
> and finding that they were installing broken cmake files as a result of
> renaming the binaries and moving the mkspecs.
Thanks for notifying.
> So please, whether you use the wrapper tool or not,
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 17:08:54 Alberto Villa wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Stephen Kelly
wrote:
> > For anyone packaging Qt 5 and renaming the binaries moc, rcc, uic, etc,
> > please remember to also change the CMake config files using those to the
> > renamed binaries.
>
>
On quarta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2012 14.52.16, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> For anyone packaging Qt 5 and renaming the binaries moc, rcc, uic, etc,
> please remember to also change the CMake config files using those to the
> renamed binaries.
For anyone packaging Qt 5: DO NOT RENAME the binaries.
W
Hi there,
For anyone packaging Qt 5 and renaming the binaries moc, rcc, uic, etc, please
remember to also change the CMake config files using those to the renamed
binaries.
The files to change are:
In qtbase.git:
* src/widgets/Qt5WidgetsConfigExtras.cmake.in
* src/dbus/Qt5DBusConfigExtras.c
15 matches
Mail list logo
