Re: [Development] Qt-Project misrepresented on qt.io

2016-04-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kojo Tero wrote: > The other side of the coin is crowding the developer page with > information. A page about contributing might be a solution, or then a > rethink of the developer page. For the mailing lists, you make a very clear distinction between development WITH Qt and development OF Qt. So

Re: [Development] Qt-Project misrepresented on qt.io

2016-04-19 Thread Alexander Nassian
I also see a growing trend at The Qt Company on trying to sell more commercial licenses by creating fear because of the opensource licenses. At any corner you hear „ohh, ohh that may not be legal to distribute, but just be sure buy a license“. This makes me kind of sad. I love Qt, I love commerc

Re: [Development] Qt-Project misrepresented on qt.io

2016-04-19 Thread Nilesh Kokane
On Apr 19, 2016 6:49 PM, "Kojo Tero" wrote: > > Hi, > > Point taken. The open source side does need to be more clearly visible. > > Currently the developer page is structured more toward the new user, with the idea that more experienced users will visit again and find more content, like the contri

Re: [Development] Qt-Project misrepresented on qt.io

2016-04-19 Thread Sean Harmer
ings in many places. Thanks Tero, much appreciated. Sean > > Tero > > -Original Message- > From: Development > [mailto:development-bounces+tero.kojo=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Sean Harmer Sent: tiistaina 19. huhtikuuta 2016 15.42 > To: development@

Re: [Development] Qt-Project misrepresented on qt.io

2016-04-19 Thread Kojo Tero
t: tiistaina 19. huhtikuuta 2016 15.42 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Qt-Project misrepresented on qt.io Hi, On Tuesday 19 April 2016 12:50:20 Olivier Goffart wrote: > I feel that with the unification, there is less and less visibility of > the Qt open source project:

Re: [Development] Qt-Project misrepresented on qt.io

2016-04-19 Thread Sean Harmer
Hi, On Tuesday 19 April 2016 12:50:20 Olivier Goffart wrote: > I feel that with the unification, there is less and less visibility of the > Qt open source project: > The qt.io home page contains no information that Qt is open source and > contains contributions from the community; > The "Developer

[Development] Qt-Project misrepresented on qt.io

2016-04-19 Thread Olivier Goffart
Hi, I feel that with the unification, there is less and less visibility of the Qt open source project: The qt.io home page contains no information that Qt is open source and contains contributions from the community; The "Developers" section, to which http://qt-project.org redirects, mostly con