Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-08-04 Thread Kojo Tero
From: development-bounces+tero.kojo=digia@qt-project.org [mailto:development-bounces+tero.kojo=digia@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Gunnar Roth Sent: 4. elokuuta 2014 9:37 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter Hi, sorry my comment has no

Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-08-04 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 08:36:37AM +0200, Gunnar Roth wrote: > sorry my comment has no relation to KArchive in special, I appreciate > [y]our efforts. I was the attitude which let me maybe overreact. We > could as well switch to LGPL and save a lot of money. > this is the _contributor_ _community

Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-08-03 Thread Gunnar Roth
Hi, sorry my comment has no relation to KArchive in special, I appreciate our efforts. I was the attitude which let me maybe overreact. We could as well switch to LGPL and save a lot of money. Never mind, Gunnar > Am 04.08.2014 um 01:02 schrieb Aleix Pol : > > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM,

Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-08-03 Thread Aleix Pol
On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Gunnar Roth wrote: > > Am 02.08.2014 um 18:14 schrieb Thiago Macieira >: > > > And to be honest, while convenient, this is not a must-have feature. With > my > OSS hat on, I would say (L)GPL-averse customers could be served right by > their > aversion by having o

Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-08-03 Thread Milian Wolff
On Sunday 03 August 2014 00:08:28 Gunnar Roth wrote: > > Am 02.08.2014 um 18:14 schrieb Thiago Macieira > > : > > > > > > And to be honest, while convenient, this is not a must-have feature. With > > my OSS hat on, I would say (L)GPL-averse customers could be served right > > by their aversion by

Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-08-02 Thread Gunnar Roth
> Am 02.08.2014 um 18:14 schrieb Thiago Macieira : > > > And to be honest, while convenient, this is not a must-have feature. With my > OSS hat on, I would say (L)GPL-averse customers could be served right by > their > aversion by having one fewer solution. > -- As someone who has a qt comme

Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-08-02 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Thursday 31 July 2014 10:30:56 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:08:15PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Monday 28 July 2014 11:08:59 Olivier Goffart wrote: > > > Otherwise, you can also use the KArchive module part of KDE Frameworks > > > http://api.kde.org/frameworks-

Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-07-31 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 05:08:15PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Monday 28 July 2014 11:08:59 Olivier Goffart wrote: > > Otherwise, you can also use the KArchive module part of KDE Frameworks > > http://api.kde.org/frameworks-api/frameworks5-apidocs/karchive/html/index.html > > The existence

Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-07-30 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Monday 28 July 2014 11:08:59 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Friday 25 July 2014 18:29:45 Alibek Omarov wrote: > > Hello, Qt Developers. :) > > > > I have a few questions. Why classes QZipReader and QZipWriter still ( for > > a 5 years? ) in gui-private section? It will be finished or dropped? >

Re: [Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-07-28 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Friday 25 July 2014 18:29:45 Alibek Omarov wrote: > Hello, Qt Developers. :) > > I have a few questions. Why classes QZipReader and QZipWriter still ( for > a 5 years? ) in gui-private section? It will be finished or dropped? Because nobody did the job to coordinate and finish the API review

[Development] QZipReader and QZipWriter

2014-07-28 Thread Alibek Omarov
Hello, Qt Developers. :) I have a few questions. Why classes QZipReader and QZipWriter still ( for a 5 years? ) in gui-private section? It will be finished or dropped? Thanks, Alibek. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists