On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 08:33:23AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 23 de setembro de 2013 16:36:43, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > The solution would have to have forward declaration header that forward
> > declares all the classes. Then we would forbid forward declaration of
> > Qt
On segunda-feira, 23 de setembro de 2013 16:36:43, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> The solution would have to have forward declaration header that forward
> declares all the classes.
> Then we would forbid forward declaration of Qt classes.
> Let a few versions for users to adapt.
> And then we can all
On Monday 23 September 2013 15:06:26 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 23 September 2013 09:45:51 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 September 2013 16:25:25 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > Right now, we allow them and I don't like the idea of forbidding forward
> > > declarations.
> >
Hi,
On Monday 23 September 2013 09:45:51 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Sunday 22 September 2013 16:25:25 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Right now, we allow them and I don't like the idea of forbidding forward
> > declarations.
> >
> > Therefore, doing anything that breaks them is source-incompatible an
On Sunday 22 September 2013 16:25:25 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On domingo, 22 de setembro de 2013 23:28:48, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > On Saturday 21 September 2013 19:13:41 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On domingo, 22 de setembro de 2013 02:21:40, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > > > I remember some class
On domingo, 22 de setembro de 2013 23:28:48, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Saturday 21 September 2013 19:13:41 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On domingo, 22 de setembro de 2013 02:21:40, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > > I remember some classes were moved from QtXml to QtCore without breaking
> > > the compat
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Saturday 21 September 2013 19:13:41 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On domingo, 22 de setembro de 2013 02:21:40, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > > I remember some classes were moved from QtXml to QtCore without
> breaking
> > > the compatibility.
On Saturday 21 September 2013 19:13:41 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On domingo, 22 de setembro de 2013 02:21:40, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> > I remember some classes were moved from QtXml to QtCore without breaking
> > the compatibility. Am I wrong?
>
> The moving did break compatibility. Which is why f
On domingo, 22 de setembro de 2013 02:21:40, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> I remember some classes were moved from QtXml to QtCore without breaking
> the compatibility. Am I wrong?
The moving did break compatibility. Which is why for Mac 32-bit builds, the
classes aren't moved at all: we added new cla
I remember some classes were moved from QtXml to QtCore without breaking
the compatibility. Am I wrong?
Regards,
Konstantin
2013/9/20 Thiago Macieira
> On quinta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2013 17:13:40, Matt Broadstone wrote:
> > Is it crazy/impossible to propose moving the QValidator class fro
On quinta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2013 17:13:40, Matt Broadstone wrote:
> Is it crazy/impossible to propose moving the QValidator class from QtGui to
> QtCore? I know it was initially designed for validating widgets, however I
> have a project right now (an ORM) that could very much benefit from t
Is it crazy/impossible to propose moving the QValidator class from QtGui to
QtCore? I know it was initially designed for validating widgets, however I
have a project right now (an ORM) that could very much benefit from these
classes. It doesn't seem that the implementation depends on QtGui at all,
12 matches
Mail list logo
