> On 17 May 2022, at 18:06, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 4:51 PM Laszlo Papp wrote:
> What is required is a widget or mode of a widget that combines both abilities.
>
> QTreeView already sort of does that, although badly. Basically, a header
> makes it look like a table, bu
] QTreeView: vertical bar between columns
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 4:51 PM Laszlo Papp
mailto:lp...@kde.org>> wrote:
What is required is a widget or mode of a widget that combines both abilities.
QTreeView already sort of does that, although badly. Basically, a header makes
it look like a table,
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 4:51 PM Laszlo Papp wrote:
> What is required is a widget or mode of a widget that combines both
>> abilities.
>>
> QTreeView already sort of does that, although badly. Basically, a header
> makes it look like a table, but it is also a tree. That is why I think the
> featu
>
> What is required is a widget or mode of a widget that combines both
> abilities.
>
QTreeView already sort of does that, although badly. Basically, a header
makes it look like a table, but it is also a tree. That is why I think the
feature request is valid. It should either not have a header or
Hi Konrad,
Am 17.05.2022 um 17:36 schrieb Konrad Rosenbaum:
On 17/05/2022 14:58, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
As mentioned in the JIRA ticket: perhaps a treeview, which is designed
to show rows of data, not cells of data, is not the right UI component
for the job, and the problem you try to solve
>
> As mentioned in the JIRA ticket: perhaps a treeview, which is designed to
> show rows of data, not cells of data, is not the right UI component for the
> job, and the problem you try to solve seems very application specific (I’m
> not aware of a native tree view on macOS or Windows that provide
> On 17 May 2022, at 12:47, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:34 AM André Somers wrote:
>
>
> On 17-05-2022 12:12, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:01 AM André Somers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 16-05-2022 23:26, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>>
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:34 AM André Somers
wrote:
>
> On 17-05-2022 12:12, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:01 AM André Somers
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 16-05-2022 23:26, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Was just wondering if it was okay to add a property for drawin
On 17-05-2022 12:12, Laszlo Papp wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:01 AM André Somers
wrote:
Hi,
On 16-05-2022 23:26, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Was just wondering if it was okay to add a property for drawing
> vertical bar between columns in the body of the QTre
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:01 AM André Somers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16-05-2022 23:26, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Was just wondering if it was okay to add a property for drawing
> > vertical bar between columns in the body of the QTreeView. Our
> > customer has requested this as otherwise it
Hi,
On 16-05-2022 23:26, Laszlo Papp wrote:
Hi,
Was just wondering if it was okay to add a property for drawing
vertical bar between columns in the body of the QTreeView. Our
customer has requested this as otherwise it was challenging to
visually separate the columns.
It looks like jpn had
>
> Hi László,
>
> Knee-jerk reaction is that I’m sceptical that this belongs into QTreeView
> itself, given how hard it is to make this look good for all the different
> styles, and how easy it evidently is to do this in a subclass that can
> solve a specific problem and doesn’t have to worry abou
> On 16 May 2022, at 23:26, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Was just wondering if it was okay to add a property for drawing vertical bar
> between columns in the body of the QTreeView. Our customer has requested this
> as otherwise it was challenging to visually separate the columns.
>
> It lo
Hi,
Was just wondering if it was okay to add a property for drawing vertical
bar between columns in the body of the QTreeView. Our customer has
requested this as otherwise it was challenging to visually separate the
columns.
It looks like jpn had a fairly trivial paintEvent implementation for thi
14 matches
Mail list logo
