[..]
> > IMHO deleting first the QML singletons then the rest of the Active
> > objects
> >
> > is also wrong, because some of the active objects might need these
> > singletons.
> >
> > I think the right way is to delete all the active objects first, then QML
> >
> > singletons, try delete a
On Monday, September 29, 2014 04:16:05 PM Harri Porten wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > Yes, with emphasis on "until". Note that we are now talking about the "end
> > of the application" situation, so our agreement ends right there ;-). We
> > are talking about the time the Q
On Mon, 29 Sep 2014, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Yes, with emphasis on "until". Note that we are now talking about the "end of
> the application" situation, so our agreement ends right there ;-). We are
> talking about the time the QQmlEngine destructor is executed, which from a QML
> engine perspecti
On Wednesday 24. September 2014 23.10.01 BogDan wrote:
[...]
> Hi,
>
> Do we all agree that the singletons, by definition, must be available to
> any object at any time until the end of the application?
Yes, with emphasis on "until". Note that we are now talking about the "end of
the applicat
- Original Message -
From: Simon Hausmann
To: BogDan
Cc: Chris Adams ; Qt Development Group
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 8:34 AM
Subject: Re: SV: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other
objects
On Monday, September 22, 2014 02:28:06 AM BogDan wrote
On Monday, September 22, 2014 02:28:06 AM BogDan wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: Simon Hausmann
> To: BogDan
> Cc: Chris Adams ; Qt Development Group
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:56 AM
> Subject: Re: SV: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted
On 19/09/2014 10:37 PM, BogDan wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
>Singletons registered using qmlRegisterSingletonType, are deleted *before*
> the other active objects. I consider it to be wrong because some of the active
> objects may still need to access the singletons in their destructor ...
>
> IMHO
- Original Message -
From: Simon Hausmann
To: BogDan
Cc: Chris Adams ; Qt Development Group
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: SV: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other
objects
On Monday 22. September 2014 01.33.14 BogDan wrote:
>
On Monday 22. September 2014 01.33.14 BogDan wrote:
> On Monday 22. September 2014 01.19.17 BogDan wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > I took a look and I'm pretty sure I'm right ;-). BTW I'm using 5.4
> > branch (sha1 f9ee33f96), is a little bit old, but I bet nobody
> > fixed it. The same problem is i
On Monday 22. September 2014 01.19.17 BogDan wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I took a look and I'm pretty sure I'm right ;-). BTW I'm using 5.4
> branch (sha1 f9ee33f96), is a little bit old, but I bet nobody
> fixed it. The same problem is in previous releases.
>
> So, the singletons are deleted in QQ
On Monday 22. September 2014 01.19.17 BogDan wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I took a look and I'm pretty sure I'm right ;-). BTW I'm using 5.4
> branch (sha1 f9ee33f96), is a little bit old, but I bet nobody
> fixed it. The same problem is in previous releases.
>
> So, the singletons are deleted in QQml
BogDan
Cc: Qt Development Group
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 9:33 AM
Subject: SV: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other
objects
Hi,
In gener‎al I agree with Chris. However I'm a little puzzled that this is
happening. If you take a look at the QQmlEngine de
Simon
Fra: Chris Adams
Sendt: 05:45 mandag 22. september 2014
Til: BogDan
Kopi: Qt Development Group
Emne: Re: [Development] [QML] Singletons are deleted before the other objects
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:37 PM, BogDan
mailto:bog_dan...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
Hello folks,
Singletons
I tend to agree. Sounds like a bug to me.
Cheers,
Lars
On 19/09/14 14:37, "BogDan" wrote:
>Hello folks,
>
> Singletons registered using qmlRegisterSingletonType, are deleted
>*before*
>the other active objects. I consider it to be wrong because some of the
>active
>objects may still need to ac
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:37 PM, BogDan wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Singletons registered using qmlRegisterSingletonType, are deleted
> *before*
> the other active objects. I consider it to be wrong because some of the
> active
> objects may still need to access the singletons in their dest
Hello folks,
Singletons registered using qmlRegisterSingletonType, are deleted *before*
the other active objects. I consider it to be wrong because some of the active
objects may still need to access the singletons in their destructor ...
IMHO singletons should be the very last objects deleted
med=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+fawzi.mohamed=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Alan
Alpert [4163654...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 5:22 PM
To: Hartmann Thomas
Cc: ; Knoll Lars
Subject: Re: [Development] QML Singletons
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Tho
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Thomas Hartmann
wrote:
> Am 11/12/2012 10:23, schrieb Knoll Lars:
>
> Hi,
>
>
it's a bit weird that you need a qmldir for that. Wouldn't it be better if
we could mark this as singleton in the implementation (ie. inside
single.qml)? Maybe use a new
Am 11/12/2012 10:23, schrieb Knoll Lars:
Hi,
>>> it's a bit weird that you need a qmldir for that. Wouldn't it be better if
>>> we could mark this as singleton in the implementation (ie. inside
>>> single.qml)? Maybe use a new keyword for that? static is already a reserved
>>> keyword in Ecma
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Hartmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
>> it's a bit weird that you need a qmldir for that. Wouldn't it be better if
>> we could mark this as singleton in the implementation (ie. inside
>> single.qml)? Maybe use a new keyword for that? static is already a reserved
>
On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Thomas Hartmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
>> it's a bit weird that you need a qmldir for that. Wouldn't it be better if
>> we could mark this as singleton in the implementation (ie. inside
>> single.qml)? Maybe use a new keyword for that? static is already a reserved
Hi,
>
> it's a bit weird that you need a qmldir for that. Wouldn't it be better if we
> could mark this as singleton in the implementation (ie. inside single.qml)?
> Maybe use a new keyword for that? static is already a reserved keyword in
> Ecmascript 5.1, so we could maybe write single.qml as
On Dec 11, 2012, at 4:55 AM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Qt 5 gains this great new qmlRegisterSingletonApi function for
> exposing global functionality from C++. This is great but sometimes
> you want to write that global functionality in QML instead of C++. Use
> cases that come
Qt 5 gains this great new qmlRegisterSingletonApi function for
exposing global functionality from C++. This is great but sometimes
you want to write that global functionality in QML instead of C++. Use
cases that come to mind include UI constants and a fake business logic
backend when prototyping.
24 matches
Mail list logo
