Re: [Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-10 Thread Alan Alpert
Okay, I'll send my mails to the main dev list. But there's a lot of stuff to start it with (I'm bringing up a couple of old issues that haven't been discussed on the ML before), so I hope no-one has a small filesize limit on their inbox ;) . -- Alan Alpert On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Kevin K

Re: [Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-10 Thread Kevin Krammer
On Saturday, 2012-12-08, Alan Alpert wrote: > It seems that it's a different set of people who are interested, and > this more targeted approach will help keep the dev ML relevant - after > the discussions today I have 7 topics I want to start threads about, > but most are for exposing to QML exis

Re: [Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-10 Thread Knoll Lars
I agree as well. Let's keep this on the main list. Cheers, Lars On Dec 10, 2012, at 10:45 AM, R. Reucher mailto:rene.reuc...@batcom-it.net>> wrote: On Monday 10 December 2012 10:05:06 Thomas Hartmann wrote: > I think we really should emphasise that QML is part of Qt and not > something differen

Re: [Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-10 Thread R. Reucher
On Monday 10 December 2012 10:05:06 Thomas Hartmann wrote: > I think we really should emphasise that QML is part of Qt and not > something different that has its own mailing list. Right. > Also keeping the QML discussions in the core mailing list ensures > visibility and might even attract new peo

Re: [Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-10 Thread Thomas Hartmann
Hi, +1 for Andre. I think we really should emphasise that QML is part of Qt and not something different that has its own mailing list. Also keeping the QML discussions in the core mailing list ensures visibility and might even attract new people to QML. Kind Regards, Thomas Hartmann Am 08/

Re: [Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-09 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:13 PM, André Pönitz < andre.poen...@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:19:58PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote: > > There were lot's of great dev day discussions started this week that > > I'd like to continue, and the question arose of "which mailing

Re: [Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-08 Thread André Pönitz
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:19:58PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote: > There were lot's of great dev day discussions started this week that > I'd like to continue, and the question arose of "which mailing list?". > While QML is part of Qt, I would like to ask is we could get a > separate mailing list for d

[Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-07 Thread Alan Alpert
There were lot's of great dev day discussions started this week that I'd like to continue, and the question arose of "which mailing list?". While QML is part of Qt, I would like to ask is we could get a separate mailing list for development of the QML engine and QML APIs. It seems that it's a diffe