On Thu, Nov 25, 2021, at 7:43 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 25 November 2021 09:21:58 MST Marius Kittler wrote:
> > > I don't need deployment from Linux in order to develop and it looks like
> > > people who have been using cross-compilation have worked around this
> > > issue.
> >
> >
On Friday, 26 November 2021 00:58:15 PST Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> If there are a lot of people doing this we should consider raising
> cross-compiling from Linux to Windows from "unsupported" to "community
> supported" at the very least. I don't expect much work, because it's
> working quite well.
On 11/26/21 1:26 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
We're just the canary. There are a lot of people cross-compiling from Linux
because the environment is much faster.
If there are a lot of people doing this we should consider raising
cross-compiling from Linux to Windows from "unsupported" to "commu
On Thursday, 25 November 2021 13:07:25 PST Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> Reverting because of the unsupported workflow of two persons might be a
> bit of an overreaction.
We're just the canary. There are a lot of people cross-compiling from Linux
because the environment is much faster.
But thanks for
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Thursday, 25 November 2021 11:57:01 PST Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, Thiago Macieira wrote:
It is possible (although not very common) to do cross compilation to macOS
- I maintain such a setup at https://github.com/mstorsjo/xcode-cros
On Thursday, 25 November 2021 11:57:01 PST Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > macdeployqt is less of an issue because there's no good toolchain for
> > cross- compiling to a Mac. Apple does not provide the sources for their
> > ld64 linker, for example.
>
> The
On 11/25/21 5:03 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
The patches that do the move are here:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/382055
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/382099
Please review.
Belated -1 after testing. Can I ask that it be reverted?
Reverting because of the
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, Thiago Macieira wrote:
macdeployqt is less of an issue because there's no good toolchain for cross-
compiling to a Mac. Apple does not provide the sources for their ld64 linker,
for example.
They do provide sources for it, see e.g.
https://opensource.apple.com/source/ld6
On Thursday, 25 November 2021 09:48:49 MST Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
> Uh, how do you run tests on Windows without at least a VM?
Wine. That suffices for all tests that I care about (non-GUI).
But I do have access to a remote Windows Virtual Desktop. I just can't install
the compiler on it. So if
On Thursday, 25 November 2021 09:21:58 MST Marius Kittler wrote:
> > I don't need deployment from Linux in order to develop and it looks like
> > people who have been using cross-compilation have worked around this
> > issue.
>
> Yes, like mxedeployqt or using static linking.
macdeployqt is less
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 17:03, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, 23 November 2021 00:40:14 MST Joerg Bornemann wrote:
>> The patches that do the move are here:
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/382055
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/382099
>>
>> Please revi
Am Donnerstag, 25. November 2021, 17:03:37 CET schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> On Tuesday, 23 November 2021 00:40:14 MST Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> > The patches that do the move are here:
> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/382055
> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/38209
On Tuesday, 23 November 2021 00:40:14 MST Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> The patches that do the move are here:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/382055
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qttools/+/382099
>
> Please review.
Belated -1 after testing. Can I ask that it be reverted?
On 11/16/21 12:06 PM, EXT Craig Scott wrote:
[proposal to move macdeployqt and windeployqt to qtbase]
Both macdeployqt and windeployqt are small and don’t depend on anything
other that QtCore (their tests do depend on QtTest as well).
With feature freeze for 6.3 only a few weeks away, it woul
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Ulf Hermann
> Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2021 3:23 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase
>
> > I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for
Agreed, +1
Cheers,
Tor Arne
On 16 Nov 2021, at 15:23, Ulf Hermann
mailto:ulf.herm...@qt.io>> wrote:
I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for install support for Qt 6.3. As part of
that, there will be conveniences for invoking the appropriate xxxdeployqt tool
where available. At the moment, ma
On 2021 Nov 16, at 12:06, EXT Craig Scott
mailto:craig.sc...@qt.io>> wrote:
I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for install support for Qt 6.3. As part of
that, there will be conveniences for invoking the appropriate xxxdeployqt tool
where available. At the moment, macdeployqt and windeployqt
I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for install support for Qt 6.3. As
part of that, there will be conveniences for invoking the appropriate
xxxdeployqt tool where available. At the moment, macdeployqt and
windeployqt live in qttools, whereas androiddeployqt lives in qtbase.
I’d like to propos
ct.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing to move deploy tools to qtbase
On Tuesday, 16 November 2021 03:06:55 PST EXT Craig Scott wrote:
> Both macdeployqt and windeployqt are small and don’t depend on anything
> other that QtCore (their tests do d
On Tuesday, 16 November 2021 03:06:55 PST EXT Craig Scott wrote:
> Both macdeployqt and windeployqt are small and don’t depend on anything
> other that QtCore (their tests do depend on QtTest as well).
>
> With feature freeze for 6.3 only a few weeks away, it would be good if we
> could resolve th
I’m working on adding new CMake APIs for install support for Qt 6.3. As part of
that, there will be conveniences for invoking the appropriate xxxdeployqt tool
where available. At the moment, macdeployqt and windeployqt live in qttools,
whereas androiddeployqt lives in qtbase. I’d like to propose
21 matches
Mail list logo
