> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Alpert [mailto:4163654...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 17. tammikuuta 2013 18:24
> To: Nurmi J-P
> Cc: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Proposal: expose the OS/platform in QML
>
> > I had the impression that pl
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Nurmi J-P wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Mohamed Fawzi
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On 16 Jan 2013, at 17:37, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rutledge Shawn
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Mohamed Fawzi
> wrote:
> >
> > On 16 Jan 2013, at 17:37, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rutledge Shawn
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
> >>>
> True. It is exactly
On 01/17/2013 04:34 AM, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:37:27AM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> I can't find the current docs, but the mobility APIs already exposed a
>> wealth of system information in the SystemInfo plugin:
>> http://doc.qt.digia.com/qtmobility/qml-systeminfo.html
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Shawn Rutledge
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:37:27AM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> I can't find the current docs, but the mobility APIs already exposed a
>> wealth of system information in the SystemInfo plugin:
>> http://doc.qt.digia.com/qtmobility/qml-syste
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:37:27AM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
> I can't find the current docs, but the mobility APIs already exposed a
> wealth of system information in the SystemInfo plugin:
> http://doc.qt.digia.com/qtmobility/qml-systeminfo.html . The right
> place for all this more device genera
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote:
>
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 17:37, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rutledge Shawn
>> wrote:
>>> On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>>>
True. It is exactly what we would use to
On 16 Jan 2013, at 17:37, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rutledge Shawn
> wrote:
>> On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>>
>>> True. It is exactly what we would use to implement the platform selector.
>>> But it can also be more pow
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rutledge Shawn
wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>
>> True. It is exactly what we would use to implement the platform selector.
>> But it can also be more powerful than that because it makes it possible to
>> implement your own platform
On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
> True. It is exactly what we would use to implement the platform selector. But
> it can also be more powerful than that because it makes it possible to
> implement your own platform selectors if you disagree with whatever mechanism
> we come u
On Jan 16, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>>>
>>> Second, it would be useful to know if I am on a "phone", "tablet" or
>>> "desktop" platform. ( can already guess by the resolution but perhaps it
>>> would be convenient to abstract it a bit.
>>
>> These days you can't really tell f
>>
>> Second, it would be useful to know if I am on a "phone", "tablet" or
>> "desktop" platform. ( can already guess by the resolution but perhaps it
>> would be convenient to abstract it a bit.
>
> These days you can't really tell from the resolution :) But I don't
> think Qt currently has a
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> These days you can't really tell from the resolution :) But I don't
> think Qt currently has a way to distinguish xcb/wayland running on a
> tablet vs a desktop, or eglfs running on a phone vs a tablet. How would
> a typical Android applicatio
On 01/16/2013 08:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>
> On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:38 PM, Attila Csipa wrote:
>
>> On 15/01/13 18:27, Nurmi J-P wrote:
>>> What do you think about exposing the underlying operating system and/or
>>> platform name in QML?
>>> ...
>>> Which one of these proposals do you like t
On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:38 PM, Attila Csipa wrote:
> On 15/01/13 18:27, Nurmi J-P wrote:
>> What do you think about exposing the underlying operating system and/or
>> platform name in QML?
>> ...
>> Which one of these proposals do you like the most, or are you against the
>> whole idea?
>
> In
On 15/01/13 18:27, Nurmi J-P wrote:
> What do you think about exposing the underlying operating system and/or
> platform name in QML?
> ...
> Which one of these proposals do you like the most, or are you against the
> whole idea?
In my eyes the real question is that comes after this one - once y
Hi all,
What do you think about exposing the underlying operating system and/or
platform name in QML?
Whilst separating platform specific things to separate files (alike "platform
content selection") is probably a good solution in general, it sounds a bit
overkill for a project like the deskto
17 matches
Mail list logo
