On 09/12/2012 12:46 PM, Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo) wrote:
> Sorry, this drowned in my mailbox. I'm ok with a QtUML playground project.
>
> Sergio, can you help setting it up?
>
> Thanks,
> Lars
>
Hi,
Will do. I'll contact Sandro offline.
Cheers,
--
Sergio Ahumada
___
Sorry, this drowned in my mailbox. I'm ok with a QtUML playground project.
Sergio, can you help setting it up?
Thanks,
Lars
On Sep 9, 2012, at 6:25 AM, ext Sandro Andrade wrote:
> Sending again to the mailing list, as suggested.
> --
> Sandro
>
> On Friday 31 August 2012 21:53:44 you wrote:
Sending again to the mailing list, as suggested.
--
Sandro
On Friday 31 August 2012 21:53:44 you wrote:
> My initial thoughts are "why not!", but can you adhere to the Qt Project's
> CLA as this is part of you PhD?
Yes, we're fine with it. There're no specific licensing expectations about it.
I j
My initial thoughts are "why not!", but can you adhere to the Qt Project's CLA
as this is part of you PhD?
The CLA is in place to both protect users of the code, but also to allow
relicensing of the code so it's usable in commercial projects, where GPL or
LGPL code would not work.
I suggest yo
Hi there,
I'm starting the development of a Qt-based implementation of OMG's MOF
specification,
as part of my phd project. As far as I know there is no C++/Qt
implementation of MOF,
only the Java ones based on Eclipse Modelling Framework
(which uses ecore instead of pure MOF).
IMO, that could be
