Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-03-12 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:11:09PM +0100, ext Stephen Kelly wrote: > I notice that several repos (I didn't look at all) contain a buildsystem > branch. Is this what that is for? > no, that's for my qmake/configure work for 5.0. we noticed that pretty much every change to qmake breaks *something*

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-03-11 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:45:58 lars.kn...@nokia.com wrote: > Yes, please. Feature development (and this counts as it) happens in > branches. We integrate when the feature is done and we're not feature > frozen. The next possibility for that is 5.1. I notice that several repos (I didn't lo

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-17 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/17/12 2:24 PM, "ext marius.storm-ol...@nokia.com" wrote: >On 17/02/2012 05:41, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On sexta-feira, 17 de fevereiro de 2012 09.19.20, >> eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote: >>> Why would that mean to reject >>> http://codereview.qt-project.org/16019 ? >>> >>> It just adds f

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-17 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 17/02/2012 05:41, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 17 de fevereiro de 2012 09.19.20, > eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote: >> Why would that mean to reject >> http://codereview.qt-project.org/16019 ? >> >> It just adds files that could be used for building Qt Creator with >> qbs, but it doe

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-17 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 17 de fevereiro de 2012 09.19.20, eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote: > Why would that mean to reject http://codereview.qt-project.org/16019 > ? > > It just adds files that could be used for building Qt Creator with qbs, but > it doesn't disrupt anybody's workflow as long as they use qmake

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-17 Thread eike.ziller
On 16 Feb 2012, at 13:35, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 16 de fevereiro de 2012 12.47.02, Mathias Hasselmann wrote: >>> But if the qbs devs want to start adding files to the Qt installation like >>> the current pkg-config, cmake and libtool files, they can. I would >>> personally

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 16 de fevereiro de 2012 14.25.37, marius.storm- ol...@nokia.com wrote: > We're not solving a bootstrapping issue. We're not shipping qbs with Qt. > We expect you to have qbs, and just use it, just like make/jom (also > based on Qt btw)/nmake/cmake/scons/waf/whatever. > > Yes, I kee

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-16 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 16/02/2012 06:35, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > What I mean is that the people developing qbs are free to do so and > even try to compile qtbase or Qt Creator with it. I'd love to see > them get qtbase up and running, including solving the bootstrapping > problem. We're not solving a bootstrappi

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-16 Thread marius.storm-olsen
On 16/02/2012 05:24, ext Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:19:10 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> If anyone wishes to start working on making Qt compile with their >> preferred >> >> buildsystem, they are welcome to do so -- in a branch. > > ... and presumably not in gerrit, but on

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-16 Thread lars.knoll
On 2/16/12 1:35 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On quinta-feira, 16 de fevereiro de 2012 12.47.02, Mathias Hasselmann >wrote: >> > But if the qbs devs want to start adding files to the Qt installation >>like >> > the current pkg-config, cmake and libtool files, they can. I would >> > personall

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 16 de fevereiro de 2012 12.47.02, Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > > But if the qbs devs want to start adding files to the Qt installation like > > the current pkg-config, cmake and libtool files, they can. I would > > personally request that they make a 1.0 release of their tool first

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 16 de fevereiro de 2012 12.24.49, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:19:10 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > If anyone wishes to start working on making Qt compile with their > > preferred > > buildsystem, they are welcome to do so -- in a branch. > > ... and presuma

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-16 Thread Mathias Hasselmann
Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 12:19 +0100 schrieb Thiago Macieira: > Ok, so you have now all seen Jörg's blog about qbs. If you haven't, please go > read it before continuing: > > http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2012/02/15/introducing-qbs/ > > Let me also remind you of the past discussions on bu

Re: [Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-16 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, February 16, 2012 12:19:10 Thiago Macieira wrote: > If anyone wishes to start working on making Qt compile with their preferred > buildsystem, they are welcome to do so -- in a branch. ... and presumably not in gerrit, but on github or any other git host? Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly

[Development] On qbs use inside Qt

2012-02-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
Ok, so you have now all seen Jörg's blog about qbs. If you haven't, please go read it before continuing: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2012/02/15/introducing-qbs/ Let me also remind you of the past discussions on buildsystems. See the threads: http://www.mail-archive.com/development@q