On Monday, 17 March 2025 01:28:44 Pacific Daylight Time Jani Heikkinen via
Development wrote:
> In the release branches, we got lots of 'nice-to-have's' picked in, which
> doesn't belong to the release branch at all.
Sometimes those nice-to-haves are dependencies for a must-have later in the
tre
On Monday, 17 March 2025 01:11:59 Pacific Daylight Time Marc Mutz via
Development wrote:
> I don't know how this goes in other modules, but in qtbase, I have been
> bitten so many times in the last weeks by missing cherry-picks that the
> issue needs some discussion. I don't want to step on any pa
On 3/14/25 5:49 PM, Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
TL;DR: do _not_ approve patches that do not "pick-to:" according to
QUIP-16 or explain in the commit message why they deviate.
This reads as if QUIP-16 would require us cherry-picking to a lower branch.
The wording, however, is:
"Changes th
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of Volker
> Hilsheimer via Development
> Sent: maanantai 17. maaliskuuta 2025 9.59
> To: Marc Mutz ; development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] On Pick-to: and QUIP-16
>
>
> Marc,
>
>
On 17.03.25 08:58, Volker Hilsheimer wrote:
>> On 14 Mar 2025, at 17:49, Marc Mutz via Development
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> TL;DR: do _not_ approve patches that do not "pick-to:" according to
>> QUIP-16 or explain in the commit message why they deviate.
>>
>> Long version:
>>
>> Just a reminder
On 17.03.25 08:10, Jörg Bornemann wrote:
> On 3/14/25 5:49 PM, Marc Mutz via Development wrote:
>
>> TL;DR: do _not_ approve patches that do not "pick-to:" according to
>> QUIP-16 or explain in the commit message why they deviate.
>
> This reads as if QUIP-16 would require us cherry-picking to a
> On 14 Mar 2025, at 17:49, Marc Mutz via Development
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> TL;DR: do _not_ approve patches that do not "pick-to:" according to
> QUIP-16 or explain in the commit message why they deviate.
>
> Long version:
>
> Just a reminder that QUIP-16¹ gives detailed instructions how far
Hi,
TL;DR: do _not_ approve patches that do not "pick-to:" according to
QUIP-16 or explain in the commit message why they deviate.
Long version:
Just a reminder that QUIP-16¹ gives detailed instructions how far
certain sets of changes should be picked, so all maintainers / all
approvers shoul
