On 11/18/2014 2:18 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>> I have not been able to find the code that generates the
>> .cmake files to figure out why it is not honoring the file extension
>> change.
>
> Here they are:
>
> qtbase/mkspecs/features/create_cmake.prf
> qtbase/m
Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> I have not been able to find the code that generates the
> .cmake files to figure out why it is not honoring the file extension
> change.
Here they are:
qtbase/mkspecs/features/create_cmake.prf
qtbase/mkspecs/features/data/cmake/*
Thanks,
Steve.
__
On Friday 14 November 2014 13:49:25 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> > I don't understand your answer.
> >
> > You're saying that nothing has linked to the Qt plugins. Well, of course.
> > By
> > definition, a plugin is something you don't link to.
>
> Right. I guess I was just restating the obv
On Fri, November 14, 2014 1:01 pm, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Friday 14 November 2014 12:43:40 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
>> On Fri, November 14, 2014 9:58 am, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > 2) User applications have plugins of their own
>>
>> I don't think this would impact an end user app wit
On Friday 14 November 2014 12:43:40 Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote:
> On Fri, November 14, 2014 9:58 am, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > 2) User applications have plugins of their own
>
> I don't think this would impact an end user app with its own plugins that
> also uses Qt5 plugins. The application
On Fri, November 14, 2014 9:58 am, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> 2) User applications have plugins of their own
I don't think this would impact an end user app with its own plugins that
also uses Qt5 plugins. The application would have been compiled with the
paths for dlopen to search for its own plug
On Friday 14 November 2014 07:58:43 Jake Petroules wrote:
> Yeah, Qt plugins should absolutely be packaged as bundles (loadable
> modules). I’ve mentioned this before; I think this is a good next aim for
> 5.5. Shouldn’t be much more work than changing the extension from .dylib to
> .bundle and add
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 7:44 AM, Morten Johan Sørvig
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 14 Nov 2014, at 02:58, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
>> wrote:
>>
>> On OS X, Qt is building plugins as dynamic libraries, instead of
>> bundles, which is the more appropriate format for the platform. This was
>> filed as Q
> On 14 Nov 2014, at 02:58, Hanspeter Niederstrasser
> wrote:
>
> On OS X, Qt is building plugins as dynamic libraries, instead of
> bundles, which is the more appropriate format for the platform. This was
> filed as QTBUG 2227 six years ago, but it was marked as closed without
> any work do
On OS X, Qt is building plugins as dynamic libraries, instead of
bundles, which is the more appropriate format for the platform. This was
filed as QTBUG 2227 six years ago, but it was marked as closed without
any work done on it, even though there was a patch listed. For the Fink
package manag
10 matches
Mail list logo
