On sábado, 25 de janeiro de 2014 22:33:36, Samuel Gaist wrote:
> On 24 janv. 2014, at 18:05, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> > On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 09:25:35, Samuel Gaist wrote:
> >> Extending this list would make the current test (if else if) getting a
> >> bit
> >> long and not necess
On 24 janv. 2014, at 18:05, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 09:25:35, Samuel Gaist wrote:
>> Extending this list would make the current test (if else if) getting a bit
>> long and not necessarily the "good thing to do (™)" so once the list of
>> extension is decide
On sexta-feira, 24 de janeiro de 2014 09:25:35, Samuel Gaist wrote:
> Extending this list would make the current test (if else if) getting a bit
> long and not necessarily the "good thing to do (™)" so once the list of
> extension is decided I would like to know what would be the Qtish way to
> sto
Hi guys,
While reviewing https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,59523 Jake Petroules
brought up an interesting point about the list of extensions that would be
worth testing.
Extending this list would make the current test (if else if) getting a bit long
and not necessarily the "good thing
