On Tuesday, November 01, 2011 16:43:12 cristiano.di-fl...@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi Andreas / all,
>
>
> I have been at the DevDays in Munich, and unfortunately I was not aware
> about this meeting...would have been nice and helpful to join the
> discussion there.
It was an unconference (no schedule
Hi Andreas / all,
I have been at the DevDays in Munich, and unfortunately I was not aware
about this meeting...would have been nice and helpful to join the
discussion there.
I am reading your notes with the QtSystems "hat" and I see a lot of
potential synergy with the QtSystems' Qt Publish&Subsc
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Robin Burchell wrote:
>> QtCore code can't be LGPL? Please elaborate.
>
> Meaning, it must be dual-GPL/LGPL licensed, plus the Nokia license exception.
Ah, LGPL only.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.o
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Frans Klaver wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
>
>> - KConfig code reuse possible?
>> No: QtCore code can't be LGPL, and too many authors for relicensing!
>
> QtCore code can't be LGPL? Please elaborate.
Meaning, it must be dual-GPL
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Andreas Hartmetz wrote:
> - KConfig code reuse possible?
> No: QtCore code can't be LGPL, and too many authors for relicensing!
QtCore code can't be LGPL? Please elaborate.
Cheers,
Frans
___
Development mailing list
De
Hi all,
At the DevDays contributors day there was a meeting with interested
parties from QtDF and the (mostly KDE-related) community about a
replacement for the scheduled-to-be-removed QSettings. Before the
meeting I gathered that there is interest in using DConf as the backend,
so I prepared a li
